Paperback, 195 pages
English language
Published April 16, 2014 by Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Area X has been cut off from the rest of the world for decades. Nature has reclaimed the last vestiges of human civilization. The first expedition returned with reports of a pristine, Edenic landscape; the second expedition ended in mass suicide, the third in a hail of gunfire as its members turned on one another. The members of the eleventh expedition returned as shadows of their former selves, and within weeks, all had died of cancer. In Annihilation, the first volume of Jeff VanderMeer's Southern Reach Trilogy, we join the twelfth expedition.
The group is made up of four women: an anthropologist; a surveyor; a psychologist, the de facto leader; and our narrator, a biologist. Their mission is to map the terrain, record all observations of their surroundings and of one another, and, above all, avoid being contaminated by Area X itself.
They arrive expecting the unexpected, and Area X …
Area X has been cut off from the rest of the world for decades. Nature has reclaimed the last vestiges of human civilization. The first expedition returned with reports of a pristine, Edenic landscape; the second expedition ended in mass suicide, the third in a hail of gunfire as its members turned on one another. The members of the eleventh expedition returned as shadows of their former selves, and within weeks, all had died of cancer. In Annihilation, the first volume of Jeff VanderMeer's Southern Reach Trilogy, we join the twelfth expedition.
The group is made up of four women: an anthropologist; a surveyor; a psychologist, the de facto leader; and our narrator, a biologist. Their mission is to map the terrain, record all observations of their surroundings and of one another, and, above all, avoid being contaminated by Area X itself.
They arrive expecting the unexpected, and Area X delivers—but it’s the surprises that came across the border with them and the secrets the expedition members are keeping from one another that change everything.
I do not understand anything I read. 4/5 will read again.
👁️🐬👍 100/100
Hard to describe without spoiling. It has a propulsive style that belies the almost physical senses the words and the text evokes. Wholly original.
Very weird with lots of visuals. I feel like the book requires you to use your imagination to formulate the details of the descriptions. I liked this book. Made me curious about the sequels, but I’m feeling like I don’t want to read the next one right away.
Cuando vi la película me pareció que la idea tenía mucho potencial, pero que la ejecución se sentía fuera de foco, y el efecto esperado en una película de ese género me resultó un poco ineficiente.
Ahora, habiendo leído el libro, siento que mi diagnóstico de la pelicula había sido bastante acertado. Sin haberlo leído en ningún lado, mientras avanzaba en la lectura, pensaba que estaba atravesando un buen ejemplar de "terror lovecraftiano" o "cosmic horror" (una descripción que ahora veo es bastante común).
Una gran ventaja que tiene el libro sobre la película es su reticencia a mostrar o explicar las cosas más de lo indispensable. El terror cósmico tiene su efecto al enfrentarnos cara a cara con aquello que origina los horrores, pero nos obliga a apartar la vista, ya que de no hacerlo caeríamos ineludiblemente en la locura o la catatonia, dejándonos solo con algunos contornos sugerentes, …
Cuando vi la película me pareció que la idea tenía mucho potencial, pero que la ejecución se sentía fuera de foco, y el efecto esperado en una película de ese género me resultó un poco ineficiente.
Ahora, habiendo leído el libro, siento que mi diagnóstico de la pelicula había sido bastante acertado. Sin haberlo leído en ningún lado, mientras avanzaba en la lectura, pensaba que estaba atravesando un buen ejemplar de "terror lovecraftiano" o "cosmic horror" (una descripción que ahora veo es bastante común).
Una gran ventaja que tiene el libro sobre la película es su reticencia a mostrar o explicar las cosas más de lo indispensable. El terror cósmico tiene su efecto al enfrentarnos cara a cara con aquello que origina los horrores, pero nos obliga a apartar la vista, ya que de no hacerlo caeríamos ineludiblemente en la locura o la catatonia, dejándonos solo con algunos contornos sugerentes, para que nuestra imaginación llene esos espacios vacíos.
La narración es fluida, con lo justo de descripciones, menos acción de lo que esperaba tras haber visto la película (lo cual es positivo, en mí opinión), y una articulada descripción de la psicología y las motivaciones de la protagonista.
Me resultó atrapante, fácil de leer, y me despertó curiosidad por saber si los libros que la continúan valdrán la pena o serán un mero "money grab".
What did I just read? Still processing this. I couldn't put this one down and was filled with concern and confusion the whole time.
See my full thoughts here
This was "Alice In Wonderland style" trippy with science, hallucinations, a very eerie location, and a serious expedition. I say that because this book does not read like a typical book.
I genuinely love it when authors push the limits of what a book can read like. This book is trippy and confusing in all the best ways and I totally understand why many people do not connect with it. I LOVE sci-fi so pulling on all the strings of technical possibilities in an unknown area got me sucked in.
I have the second book on the way because this is just so fascinating and such a fun reading experience. Genuine art.
Because my brain chemistry wasn't altered and I didn't …
What did I just read? Still processing this. I couldn't put this one down and was filled with concern and confusion the whole time.
See my full thoughts here
This was "Alice In Wonderland style" trippy with science, hallucinations, a very eerie location, and a serious expedition. I say that because this book does not read like a typical book.
I genuinely love it when authors push the limits of what a book can read like. This book is trippy and confusing in all the best ways and I totally understand why many people do not connect with it. I LOVE sci-fi so pulling on all the strings of technical possibilities in an unknown area got me sucked in.
I have the second book on the way because this is just so fascinating and such a fun reading experience. Genuine art.
Because my brain chemistry wasn't altered and I didn't feel a lot of emotion as a mood reader, I am rating this four stars. I have recently read other sci-fi books from lesser-known authors that I think are SO SO good and need to keep those ratings in mind as well.
Content warning General statements about themes and plot events
I am definitely going to come back and reread this one, because I feel there's still some tasty snacks hidden amongst the pages.
Honestly, this book was so good I'm having trouble what to talk about, so I'll just kinda free associate. The writing is amazing. The unreliable narrator is pulled off masterfully. There are scenes in the book that made me physically tense. The end was somehow both a happy ending and a sad ending, which are my favorite kind.
I could say more but honestly, you should just read the book.
Content warning General statements about themes and plot events
I am definitely going to come back and reread this one, because I feel there's still some tasty snacks hidden amongst the pages.
Honestly, this book was so good I'm having trouble what to talk about, so I'll just kinda free associate. The writing is amazing. The unreliable narrator is pulled off masterfully. There are scenes in the book that made me physically tense. The end was somehow both a happy ending and a sad ending, which are my favorite kind.
I could say more but honestly, you should just read the book.
Damn you Goodreads for your lack of half or quarter stars. This is more 3.5 to me. I think this is an instance of the movie being better than the book. Though I saw the movie first. So that’s likely skewing my opinion. The movie is also fairly vague and inconclusive. Which doesn’t bother me too much. It leaves room to take what you will from the story.
I felt themes of divorce and/or loss. I didn’t immediately made the connection. When I got divorced I remember seeing “dissolution of marriage” on the final paperwork. Only then did it really set in. I think the final part of the book being named “Dissolution” put me in that frame of mind. So maybe I was looking for meaning when there might not have been.
The biologists journey through the tower and past the crawler reminded me of pushing through grief, seeing …
Damn you Goodreads for your lack of half or quarter stars. This is more 3.5 to me. I think this is an instance of the movie being better than the book. Though I saw the movie first. So that’s likely skewing my opinion. The movie is also fairly vague and inconclusive. Which doesn’t bother me too much. It leaves room to take what you will from the story.
I felt themes of divorce and/or loss. I didn’t immediately made the connection. When I got divorced I remember seeing “dissolution of marriage” on the final paperwork. Only then did it really set in. I think the final part of the book being named “Dissolution” put me in that frame of mind. So maybe I was looking for meaning when there might not have been.
The biologists journey through the tower and past the crawler reminded me of pushing through grief, seeing all the permutations of it and deciding that you will go on. There were a couple quotes I neglected to highlight to support my theory. I’ll try to dig them up.
Um. I will continue on in the series. It was interesting. But let's see; the prose was... relentless. Like a pressure squeezing my temples. I can't say it was pleasant.
But now I feel obligated to continue. Like in homage to those traveled before.
n.b. A âno starâ rating for books I review does not imply criticismâI rarely give ratings, as giving stars is an unhelpfully blunt instrument and all too often involves comparing apples with oranges.returnreturnThat VanderMeer takes a âless is moreâ approach is embedded right from the moment the reader discovers that they will not learn the charactersâ names. This sets out a ground ruleâthat you will barely get the amount of information you need, and not a comma moreâand it reinforces the strange, strained relationships between the scientists, who will share a transformative experience without knowing anything about each other, and between their expedition and Area X, an intensely, compellingly weird landscape. returnreturnThe story is a first-person narrative, the âIâ is a product of an isolated youth, an âexpert in the uses of solitudeâ. This makes for an interesting point of view, especially here. The question of the reliability of the …
n.b. A âno starâ rating for books I review does not imply criticismâI rarely give ratings, as giving stars is an unhelpfully blunt instrument and all too often involves comparing apples with oranges.returnreturnThat VanderMeer takes a âless is moreâ approach is embedded right from the moment the reader discovers that they will not learn the charactersâ names. This sets out a ground ruleâthat you will barely get the amount of information you need, and not a comma moreâand it reinforces the strange, strained relationships between the scientists, who will share a transformative experience without knowing anything about each other, and between their expedition and Area X, an intensely, compellingly weird landscape. returnreturnThe story is a first-person narrative, the âIâ is a product of an isolated youth, an âexpert in the uses of solitudeâ. This makes for an interesting point of view, especially here. The question of the reliability of the narrator naturally enough arises, but is more difficult to answer when events recounted never seem to amount to more than hints as to something else: the past, the future, a different interpretation. returnreturnThe very first feature the four scientists encounter is the foot of a stone stairway that tunnels down into the ground, which the narrator stubbornly persists in calling a tower. The scientists are part of an official investigation into the âmysteriesâ of Area X, but all they really discover, even those that survive, is that the mysteries are far more evolved than anyone expected. They entered the Area X territory in the hope of finding out about its mysteries, but three out of four do not survive their encounter with its unmediated reality. They arrive under instruction to record information about Area X but Area X seems, in its unexplained way, to be recording itself, keeping the scientistsâ records as well as their remains. returnreturnBy the end, the narrator has acknowledged the collapse of her "compulsion" to "know everything"¸and that even if she had clung to it, âour instruments are useless, our methodology broken, our motivations selfish." What makes this compelling is that it is an admission not of defeat but of a radically altered perspective of her role in relation to uncanniness, which, under the circumstances, seems the only sane admission to make. returnVanderMeer pulls off the remarkable feat of presenting an immensely rich and immersive story in a narrative style that is elusive and ambiguous and a linguistic style that is reticent yet precise. This is a compelling combination.
I'm not sure if I'd call this one of my favorites, but there was something gripping about the way it was written and the slow burn of revelations. The utter unknowableness of everything was crushing, and the mysteries never fully unraveled, but I couldn't put it down.
This book didn’t really work for me. Neither horror nor science fiction. It didn’t work as a thriller either. It needed more development. Some was there for the lead character but meeting the other characters in training would have provided connection and depth that was wanted.
Absolutely peak Weird. It only took me 10 years to start reading this and oh my god, it was so much better than I expected. The setting, characters and ambiguity are amazing. Im in love with the worldbuilding. Cant wait to read the other ones!
Annihilation is a lucid and often disorienting reading experience. Incredibly unique and original ideas. Makes you feel like you just dropped acid.
