@loppear Skimming the reviews it looks like a common concern is the lack of queer / trans / nonbinary considerations in the data analysis. Are you finding that? Still worth reading even if so?

@seanderson13 the reviews are correct, it's a major blind spot. As with the central thesis that default male structures and data ignore and elide women's needs, the book speaks of women almost entirely as a monolithic whole. The author's recurring demands for disaggregated data analysis and diverse voices in decision-making leave an unspoken echo in my head "yes, along so much more than this single dimension".