Introducing James Bond: charming, sophisticated, handsome, chillingly ruthless and licensed to kill. This, the first of Ian Fleming's tales of secret agent 007, finds Bond on a mission to neutralize a lethal, high-rolling Russian operative called simply "le Chiffre" -- by ruining him at the Baccarat table and forcing his Soviet spymasters to "retire" him. It seems that lady luck is taken with 007 -- le Chiffre has hit a losing streak. But some people just refuse to play by the rules, and Bond's attraction to a beautiful female agent leads him to disaster and an unexpected savior...
For all the complexity and mythology of the Bond phenomenon, the first entry is simple, straightforward, well-written and fun. Deep misogyny dates it out, but overall I enjoyed it. It's actually a novel of very modest scope; I would love to see a very loyal remake of a movie that maintains the weathered french casino town vibe, the self-involved Bond mostly trying not to screw up the little things, the slow, tedious car chases...
This novel is very simplistic and offers a (to be kind) simplistic plot. James Bond is not very developed as a character... and is not even close to the 'super hero' he has become. Nonetheless, I will read a few additional novels just to see how the character evolves.
Oh and I will read Flemeings and other author's novels to support Canada's right to determine it's own copyright law, without the 'guidance' of Donald Trump. See gutenberg.ca
I thought it was a fairly fun book to read. I've never read a Bond book before and think I've only seen one or two movies and remember nothing about them. If it weren't for the horrible, absolutely terrible sexism, I would have likely loved it. Yes, I completely understand that it must be taken in context of the time and the sort of man Bond is and his profession. I get all of that but it still took away from my enjoyment of the book.
I don't think I'd read another but I'm glad I read this one. I don't know. Maybe I would read another. Maybe.
I cannot believe how long it took me to start reading Bond. I was a massive fan of the older Bond movies when I was young (but not so much the newer ones, after Bond's character became diluted in political correctness). I also love gambling, so I was thrilled to find out how detailed this book got about the intricacies of the casino games. Baccarat has always confused the crap out of me, but now, thanks to Fleming's description, through Bond, I have a fairly good idea how to play it, and would love to try it sometime!
In the beginning, Bond is a complete misogynist, and a bit of a racist. I'm no expert, but it's shocking how little he understands women and how their minds work! Then again, I guess that was probably true of most men, back in the '50s, when the book was written.
The mission …
I cannot believe how long it took me to start reading Bond. I was a massive fan of the older Bond movies when I was young (but not so much the newer ones, after Bond's character became diluted in political correctness). I also love gambling, so I was thrilled to find out how detailed this book got about the intricacies of the casino games. Baccarat has always confused the crap out of me, but now, thanks to Fleming's description, through Bond, I have a fairly good idea how to play it, and would love to try it sometime!
In the beginning, Bond is a complete misogynist, and a bit of a racist. I'm no expert, but it's shocking how little he understands women and how their minds work! Then again, I guess that was probably true of most men, back in the '50s, when the book was written.
The mission is to out-gamble a powerful and desperate adversary named Le Chiffre. Bond of course pulls it off, and I don't think there's any spoiler in me saying that. The mission, though, is simply a prelude to the love affair between Bond and the female spy whom he worked with. I thought that that story was far more detailed than it would've been in the movie (I haven't seen the movie), taking up 20% of the book. I found it thoroughly satisfying. We get to see Bond's sensitive and philosophical side grow, even start to feel a little sorry for him. I particularly enjoyed his philosophical meanderings on the nature of good and evil.
For the most part, though, I found the plot to be somewhat predictable. I think that that's probably because the story is so old now, and elements of it have been borrowed so many times over the years, for so many different spy stories and thrillers. Perhaps if I'd read it in the '50s, it would've garnered a five star review from me!
One thing I can say is that the ending was a complete surprise for me, and made it all worthwhile! Can't wait to read the next one!
