Zealot: The Life and Times of Jesus of Nazareth is a book by Iranian-American writer and scholar Reza Aslan. It is a historical account of the life of Jesus and analyzes the various religious perspectives on Jesus as well as the creation of Christianity. It is a New York Times best seller. Aslan argues that Jesus was a political, rebellious and eschatological (end times) Jew whose proclamation of the coming kingdom of God was a call for regime change, for ending Roman hegemony over Judea and the corrupt and oppressive aristocratic priesthood. The book has been optioned by Lionsgate and producer David Heyman with a script co-written by Aslan and Oscar- screenwriter, James Schamus.The book has gathered mixed reviews. While it was positively received by the general public, scholars with relevant subject matter expertise have been critical of its content, methodology and Aslan’s claims about his academic credentials.
Fantastic! For people looking for a deeper understanding of the historical Jesus and time period he lived in, this is the book for you. The author is careful and respectful with the topic while doing his best to stick with the historical facts. The low rating on Goodreads is deceptive, weighed down by reviewers unable to bridge or desire to understand the biblical Jesus and the Jesus of Nazareth.
This book provides a very interesting view to the history of Christianity and its belief system. It paints a picture of Jesus of Nazareth as a revolutionary rebel, challenging the status quo and trying to reverse the wealth and power dynamics of the society he lived in. Religion lessons in school would've been way more interesting if these aspects would've been discussed!
For a long time, I've thought that pretty much everything in the Bible is made up. Apparently, this is not the case. This book provides an interesting dive into the historical aspects of Jesus and the Bible and the religious layers added onto the accounts later on.
I've never thought about the political situation in ancient Palestine and knew practically nothing about the Roman occupation and the status of the Palestinian Jews. This book gave me a whole new understanding of how modern Christianity was born – and …
This book provides a very interesting view to the history of Christianity and its belief system. It paints a picture of Jesus of Nazareth as a revolutionary rebel, challenging the status quo and trying to reverse the wealth and power dynamics of the society he lived in. Religion lessons in school would've been way more interesting if these aspects would've been discussed!
For a long time, I've thought that pretty much everything in the Bible is made up. Apparently, this is not the case. This book provides an interesting dive into the historical aspects of Jesus and the Bible and the religious layers added onto the accounts later on.
I've never thought about the political situation in ancient Palestine and knew practically nothing about the Roman occupation and the status of the Palestinian Jews. This book gave me a whole new understanding of how modern Christianity was born – and created – and what its relationship with Jesus' teachings and views is like. (Very distant and often contradictory.) I also learned about one of the earliest roots of antisemitism: the Jews were explicitly blamed for killing Jesus in an attempt to appeal to the Romans who became the biggest target audience for early Christianity. This was very interesting to me.
The book is a well-functioning mix of nonfiction and academic literature. The main book is in literary style, while the notes are more academic and contain a lot of sources. They're still quite readable, at least in my opinion.
My biggest grievance with the book is not providing the original names of the people discussed. Jesus' original name (Yeshu) is mentioned, but anyone else's is not. I would have also liked to know the definition for a cult, as Aslan often refers to the "Jewish cult". And I was left wondering why Jesus started to follow John the Baptist in the first place. Maybe it's not known, but it could've been addressed. However, these are quite small things; it's a very good book.
Review of 'Zealot: The Life and Times of Jesus of Nazareth' on 'Goodreads'
5 stars
Over the past four years I've read several books, similar in concept to this one, including many by Bart Ehrman who possibly has the largest number of texts in the area including: [b:Did Jesus Exist?: The Historical Argument for Jesus of Nazareth|11543839|Did Jesus Exist? The Historical Argument for Jesus of Nazareth|Bart D. Ehrman|https://d.gr-assets.com/books/1328053160s/11543839.jpg|16483538], [b:Jesus, Interrupted: Revealing the Hidden Contradictions in the Bible & Why We Don't Know About Them|6101996|Jesus, Interrupted Revealing the Hidden Contradictions in the Bible & Why We Don't Know About Them|Bart D. Ehrman|https://d.gr-assets.com/books/1348078937s/6101996.jpg|6279259], [b:From Jesus to Constantine: A History of Early Christianity|2397133|From Jesus to Constantine A History of Early Christianity|Bart D. Ehrman|https://d.gr-assets.com/books/1438441668s/2397133.jpg|2404151][b:The New Testament|260609|The New Testament (Great Courses, #656)|Bart D. Ehrman|https://d.gr-assets.com/books/1409471782s/260609.jpg|17875076], and a good portion of [b:The Text of the New Testament: Its Transmission, Corruption & Restoration|240196|The Text of the New Testament Its Transmission, Corruption & Restoration|Bruce M. Metzger|https://d.gr-assets.com/books/1388535910s/240196.jpg|232680].
Of the group, which has a lot of …
Over the past four years I've read several books, similar in concept to this one, including many by Bart Ehrman who possibly has the largest number of texts in the area including: [b:Did Jesus Exist?: The Historical Argument for Jesus of Nazareth|11543839|Did Jesus Exist? The Historical Argument for Jesus of Nazareth|Bart D. Ehrman|https://d.gr-assets.com/books/1328053160s/11543839.jpg|16483538], [b:Jesus, Interrupted: Revealing the Hidden Contradictions in the Bible & Why We Don't Know About Them|6101996|Jesus, Interrupted Revealing the Hidden Contradictions in the Bible & Why We Don't Know About Them|Bart D. Ehrman|https://d.gr-assets.com/books/1348078937s/6101996.jpg|6279259], [b:From Jesus to Constantine: A History of Early Christianity|2397133|From Jesus to Constantine A History of Early Christianity|Bart D. Ehrman|https://d.gr-assets.com/books/1438441668s/2397133.jpg|2404151][b:The New Testament|260609|The New Testament (Great Courses, #656)|Bart D. Ehrman|https://d.gr-assets.com/books/1409471782s/260609.jpg|17875076], and a good portion of [b:The Text of the New Testament: Its Transmission, Corruption & Restoration|240196|The Text of the New Testament Its Transmission, Corruption & Restoration|Bruce M. Metzger|https://d.gr-assets.com/books/1388535910s/240196.jpg|232680].
Of the group, which has a lot of overlap in general thesis and examples, this is by far the best in terms of presentation of a story and all the details. Aslan's writing is interesting, evocative, well-researched, and intrinsically entertaining. As a product, in part, of the Johns Hopkins Writing Seminars, I'm loathe to acknowledge a graduate of Iowa's wriiting program, but Aslan certainly does great credit to his alma mater. He does a relatively good job of describing his own background for those interested in his viewpoint from a historical perspective. He also does an excellent job of pointing out what his own opinions are as well as highlighting where his though differs from that of other scholars in the field and where theirs differs from each other.
While this is most assuredly a popular-press title and aimed at a far broader audience (like many of Ehrman's works) than the more specialized scholarly treatises he references, I have to take Aslan (or far more likely his editors) to task for the poor presentation/layout of the notes provided in the back. The book would appear to be relatively well footnoted with exception to the fact that the footnotes don't appear within the text, nor do they appear even at the bottom of the pages. Even worse, the 50+ pages of excellent (and actually read-worthy) notes in the end are sorted by chapter and have no indicators to the portions of the main text to which they directly relate, which make them terrifically painful for other scholars to contemplate using in any functional way. Hopefully future editions will at least include numbered indicators in the main text that tie to the notes in the back. While this is aimed toward the masses, it's really a shame that the presentation of the notes within the book wasn't handled a bit better. At least the biblical references were included within the primary text - and these in themselves do a great job of indicating the synoptic nature of the New Testament gospels.
One thing that Aslan includes that I haven't seen thus far in much of my reading is a fantastic overview of first century Palestine from a sociological and political perspective to help put the balance of the story into context. All of the major players seem to be well represented and given reasonable weight. If only more histories could be written in this way, perhaps the world would read non-fiction for entertainment rather than the litany of romance, thrillers, sci-fi/fantasy, and general fiction that dominates the best-seller lists. His overview is not only interesting in and of itself, it takes up almost the first third of the text and continues on as necessary through the remainder of the text to provide continued context.
In summation, the book was well-researched, entertainingly presented and phenomenally interesting, even to someone who's read the majority of the details in the recent past. I would highly recommend this to anyone and everyone (regardless of their religious leanings), particularly as the subject concerns two of the most influential figures in all of western history/philosophy. Aslan presents some excellent facts, ideas, and thoughts that are assuredly not known by a majority of people, who really should be aware of them.
This is an interesting read, though there are places where it is obvious that the author is engaging in pure conjecture. He mostly points these places out, but not in all places. It is an interesting thesis, though it is not a new one.
The only reason is that I am giving it 4 stars instead of 5 is because of the scholarly shortcomings of the work. Apart from that, it is a worthwhile read with lots of great perspective and insight.
Review of 'Zealot: The Life and Times of Jesus of Nazareth' on 'Goodreads'
4 stars
Interesting look at the historic Jesus and how much of Christianity was created 100 years after his death. Much of what is missing now is the revolutionary Jewishness of Jesus (as in wanting to be free of the Roman Empire) which was remade by those who came after him into a religion which would appeal to gentile Romans.
Especially interesting are all the stories which would have been a narrative (i.e. story telling instead of historical) aimed at then contemporary audiences who would have known that they were more meant as metaphor rather than historic accounting which have become cornerstone elements in Christianity. Stories such as being born in Bethlehem, the flight to Egypt, the misinterpretation of the two thieves being crucified, etc., are completely unsupported by any historical documents but serve great purpose in slotting the new religion into historic prophecy and appealing to new audiences.
Review of 'Zealot: The Life and Times of Jesus of Nazareth' on 'Goodreads'
3 stars
Aslan is a very colorful writer; he has some very powerful passages that help to bring the world of that time to life.
My biggest issue is that he very much has an agenda when writing this book. I saw a piece of the Fox News interview; I wish someone had asked him why it appears that his criteria for the validity off a Bible passage is how well it supports his thesis. If the passage fits, it is accepted without question; if it doesn't fit, it obviously was added later as part of the early church building a mythology around Jesus (or something like that).
I think there is useful material in this book; just temper it with someone like N. T. Wright.