In Defense of Food: An Eater's Manifesto

205 pages

English language

Published April 10, 2008

ISBN:
978-1-59420-145-5
Copied ISBN!
Goodreads:
315425

View on Inventaire

4 stars (37 reviews)

1 edition

Review of "In Defense of Food: An Eater's Manifesto" on 'Goodreads'

5 stars

Fascinating book. I took lots of notes and highlights while reading it, hopefully I can pull them together soon, but the core of the book is "Eat Food, not too much, mostly plants".

(Saying food he makes the point of leaving out food-like or edible manufactured products, like Oreos, Fritos, Twinkies, Gatorade ...)

He investigates the impact of the Western diet as terribly wrong in many aspects. The impact of that diet into our health is a reality in the USA: more obesity (yet people are undernourished), more cardiovascular problems, diabetes, caries, digestive problems, cancer, allergies ... and how many of these are reversible in a rather short time span.

He goes on talking about the dangers of nutritional reductionism and nutrisionism (as an obsession), which inform policies, and the processed food market, into adding or removing elements without assessing interactions or the impact of those new combinations in our …

Review of "In Defense of Food: An Eater's Manifesto" on 'Goodreads'

4 stars

Very interesting read. Food engineering has made food into food-like substances which contain little original nutrition of what they purport to be and have led to increased illnesses (obesity, diabetes, etc) since the Western diet has abandoned food for highly processed food. Nutritionists have been stymied by the search for the missing magical nutrient while ignoring overall dietary changes. Food manufacturers have enormous political influence (it is illegal in many states to criticise beef products, US guidelines allow 25% of daily calories to be sugar instead of WHO set levels of 10%) interfering with regulations and scientific investigations.

Michael Pollan gives a simple set of rules of thumb (eat food, eat mostly plants, eat less, don't eat food your great-grandmother wouldn't recognize, don't eat products with more than 5 ingredients, don't eat products with ingredients you don't know what they are, etc) to help guide back to diet which works …

Review of "In Defense of Food: An Eater's Manifesto" on 'Goodreads'

4 stars

"Eat food. Not too much. Mostly plants." So begins a fascinating book about the author's attempts to understand how the current north American diet has become mire shaped by economic forces than nutritional value, and how the simple consumer can identify what is healthy vs unhealthy at the supermarket these days.

Pollan oversimplifies in places, but the result is still an excellent, thought-provoking and enlightening book that anybody concerned with eating healthily or living longer should read. It's changed the way I eat and feed my loved ones. I would highly recommend this book to pretty much everyone.

Review of "In Defense of Food: An Eater's Manifesto" on 'Goodreads'

4 stars

A great follow-up to The Omnivore's Dilemma. This book moves on from that one's coverage of how food is produced to ask the question "What should we be eating?" and comes away with a deceptively simple answer: "Food. Not too much. Mostly plants." The rest of the book breaks down that answer and tries to explain why it's not necessarily as self-evident as it first seems. Ask yourself how much time in the past week you actually spent really thinking about, enjoying, or making food. If the answer is less than a few hours, pick this book up and find out what you're missing.

Review of "In Defense of Food: An Eater's Manifesto" on 'Goodreads'

3 stars

If I hadn't enjoyed Michael Pollan's The Omnivore's Dilemma so much, I probably would have put this one down after the first chapter. Pollan uses so many of the buzzwords I usually rely on to detect anti-scientific cranks that I honestly felt dirty pushing ahead and finishing the book. Over the course of just a few pages, he coins the term "nutritionism" to denote what he describes as a "reductionist" science that relies on a specially educated "priesthood" to tell the rest of us what to eat, in defiance of the cultural traditions we should instead rely on.

It does get better, and Pollan's guidelines for choosing meals (summed up in the book's first sentence, "Eat food. Not too much. Mostly plants.") are useful, and do, after all rely on recent scientific findings. His theme is that that nutrition science, by focusing on which particular nutrients are good and which …

avatar for wakatara

rated it

5 stars
avatar for Scoured8735

rated it

3 stars
avatar for geoffrey

rated it

4 stars
avatar for dria

rated it

3 stars
avatar for nstillger

rated it

4 stars
avatar for souperman

rated it

5 stars
avatar for Gerry

rated it

4 stars
avatar for 73pctGeek

rated it

4 stars
avatar for suddzzjr

rated it

4 stars
avatar for 2tinybirds

rated it

2 stars
avatar for AnneLouiseMerrill

rated it

5 stars
avatar for tremain

rated it

5 stars
avatar for bondolo

rated it

3 stars
avatar for satyajit

rated it

5 stars
avatar for WonkoTheSane

rated it

5 stars
avatar for oox

rated it

5 stars
avatar for greystar

rated it

5 stars
avatar for yashima

rated it

4 stars
avatar for Myshkin

rated it

4 stars
avatar for WBucclan

rated it

4 stars
avatar for bioscape

rated it

3 stars
avatar for Cozycello

rated it

5 stars
avatar for oobisan

rated it

4 stars
avatar for yo.ian.g

rated it

2 stars
avatar for Themlyn

rated it

5 stars