Lettera a una nazione cristiana
4 stars
Breve ma efficace critica al cristianesimo fondamentalista tipicamente americano e al pensiero religioso in genere. Consigliato.
Hardcover, 96 pages
English language
Published Feb. 5, 2006 by Knopf.
Letter to a Christian Nation is a 2006 book by Sam Harris, written in response to feedback he received following the publication of his first book The End of Faith. The book is written in the form of an open letter to a Christian in the United States. Harris states that his aim is "to demolish the intellectual and moral pretensions of Christianity in its most committed forms." In October it entered the New York Times Best Seller list at number seven.
Breve ma efficace critica al cristianesimo fondamentalista tipicamente americano e al pensiero religioso in genere. Consigliato.
Ciekawa forma - autor zwraca się bezpośrednio do czytelnika-chrześcijanina.
Harris przedstawia w skumulowanej i skompresowanej formie większość popularnych argumentów za ateizmem.
W jednym momencie pisze o "większości chrześcijan" wierzących w coś i zakłada jednocześnie, że czytelnik należy do tej większości.
Książka krótka, szybko się ją czyta.
Wydaje mi się, że chrześcijanie mają na tyle "zawiłą" argumentację, że na każdy z tych zarzutów da się znaleźć coś jeszcze, jakąś odpowiedź na zarzuty, dobre ćwiczenie umysłowe ;). Ale to wada książek, nie ma dialogu, jest monolog.
Książkę oceniłem wyżej niż "Koniec wiary", bo spełnia obietnicę z okładki i opisu. Jest dokładnie to, co przedstawia tytuł.
Choć merytorycznie "Koniec wiary" wydaje się chyba lepszy.
Finally carved out a few hours to read this classic. Sam Harris has a gift of boiling down profound concepts into short (this book is just 90 pages) and persuasive arguments.
“Clearly, it is time we learned to meet our emotional needs without embracing the preposterous. We must find ways to invoke the power of ritual and to mark those transitions in every human life that demand profundity— birth, marriage, death—without lying to ourselves about the nature of reality. Only then will the practice of raising our children to believe that they are Christian, Muslim, or Jewish be widely recognized as the ludicrous obscenity that it is. And only then will we stand a chance of healing the deepest and most dangerous fractures in our world.”
More quotes here: www.goodreads.com/work/quotes/563115-letter-to-a-christian-nation
"Letter to a Christian Nation" by Sam Harris is a concise, impassioned pamphlet detailing many arguments against religion. Billing itself as a response to the intolerant response that he received to his first book "The End of Faith," the small book is one ...of the strongest of the "New Atheist" writings. Harris is considered one of the "New Atheists," along with scientist Richard Dawkins and journalist Christopher Hitchens. All three argue for a more muscular, activist movement represented non-believers. Out of the three, I find Harris to be the strongest writer and thinker. Unlike Hitchens, who seems enamored of his own words, and Dawkins, whose egotism seems to overwhelm his writing, Harris takes a back-seat from his subject (a note- I have not extensively read Dawkins, but have formed my opinion from opinion pieces and articles). No less passionate then his counterparts, he shows more nuance in a movement that …
"Letter to a Christian Nation" by Sam Harris is a concise, impassioned pamphlet detailing many arguments against religion. Billing itself as a response to the intolerant response that he received to his first book "The End of Faith," the small book is one ...of the strongest of the "New Atheist" writings. Harris is considered one of the "New Atheists," along with scientist Richard Dawkins and journalist Christopher Hitchens. All three argue for a more muscular, activist movement represented non-believers. Out of the three, I find Harris to be the strongest writer and thinker. Unlike Hitchens, who seems enamored of his own words, and Dawkins, whose egotism seems to overwhelm his writing, Harris takes a back-seat from his subject (a note- I have not extensively read Dawkins, but have formed my opinion from opinion pieces and articles). No less passionate then his counterparts, he shows more nuance in a movement that often lacks subtlety. For all of its flaws, I think this movement is deeply important, as the number of non-believers are increasing and find themselves seeking voices to articulate their feelings and furthermore, seeking to find a place in a world often hostile to them. His argument is for the most part compelling, arguing that one can be a good, moral person and contribute positively to society without believing in religion. His main target is Christianity and makes some compelling arguments against the uniqueness of Christian beliefs and morality. However, I do not agree with how far he goes in arguing against religion totally, especially his belief that moderates in religions give cover to fundamentalists and extremists. A strong, excellent work.