It’s thirty years from now. We’re making progress, mitigating climate change, slowly but surely. But what about all the angry old people who can’t let go?
For young Americans a generation from now, climate change isn't controversial. It's just an overwhelming fact of life. And so are the great efforts to contain and mitigate it. Entire cities are being moved inland from the rising seas. Vast clean-energy projects are springing up everywhere. Disaster relief, the mitigation of floods and superstorms, has become a skill for which tens of millions of people are trained every year. The effort is global. It employs everyone who wants to work. Even when national politics oscillates back to right-wing leaders, the momentum is too great; these vast programs cannot be stopped in their tracks.
But there are still those Americans, mostly elderly, who cling to their red baseball caps, their grievances, their huge vehicles, their …
It’s thirty years from now. We’re making progress, mitigating climate change, slowly but surely. But what about all the angry old people who can’t let go?
For young Americans a generation from now, climate change isn't controversial. It's just an overwhelming fact of life. And so are the great efforts to contain and mitigate it. Entire cities are being moved inland from the rising seas. Vast clean-energy projects are springing up everywhere. Disaster relief, the mitigation of floods and superstorms, has become a skill for which tens of millions of people are trained every year. The effort is global. It employs everyone who wants to work. Even when national politics oscillates back to right-wing leaders, the momentum is too great; these vast programs cannot be stopped in their tracks.
But there are still those Americans, mostly elderly, who cling to their red baseball caps, their grievances, their huge vehicles, their anger. To their "alternative" news sources that reassure them that their resentment is right and pure and that "climate change" is just a giant scam.
And they're your grandfather, your uncle, your great-aunt. And they're not going anywhere. And they’re armed to the teeth.
The Lost Cause What do we do about people who cling to the belief that their own children are the enemy? When, in fact, they're often the elders that we love?
Doctorow does a really good job of building out the world and the society that the main characters live in. This book still fell prey to the one complaint that I have with Doctorow's fictional writing, which is that all of the main characters (regardless of age/gender/etc) seem to speak with his voice. An example of this would be an adolescent teenage boy calling a teenage girl "a good egg". I have trouble seeing a young person actually talking like that.
However, even with that minor nagging complaint, this was a great book!
excellent doctorow on near climate and political violence
3 stars
Doctorow at his strongest, ala Little Brother, didactic and engaging, young characters imagining freedom to work together on new ways to respond to current climate challenges and reactionary repression.
Hungry for more books that envision a future where we deal with climate change
3 stars
I'm personally hungry for books that envision a world where we deal with climate change. I'm glad this book exists, and there should be more in this niche.
This book had some lovely parts - the emphasis on local/municipal activism I really appreciated.
However there were parts of the book that read as "well it's up to the younger generation(s) because the Olds are The Problem" which I didn't care for. There are old environmentalists living today getting stuff done, and young people who deny climate change is happening. Nobody is too old to contribute to the movement and generational politics are a smokescreen for class issues.
Also why why why is cryptocurrency being taken seriously here? sob
Meaningful and engaging exploration of near future climate activism
4 stars
While some sold it as "solarpunk," I'm not sure it fits this genre. Brooks, the "hero" character, is emotionally complex, but eternally falls on optimism. And his comrades generally seem to share an upbeat nature. Near future southern California is hot, plagued by fires, and dealing with the fallout of MAGA racists and their "plut", cryptocurrency allies, a broader swath of "decent people", and the leftist activists that are trying to create change in the face of climate catastrophe that leaves many internally displaced persons. A few characters add some political complexity, but there's an overall "us vs them" equation that lays the foundation for the book. It reads like a few others of Doctorow's books (Walkaway in mind), where there's a constant back and forth between positive, hopeful movement, and reactionary destruction. It shares with other solarpunk (1) a lot of talk about solar and carbon neutral or negative …
While some sold it as "solarpunk," I'm not sure it fits this genre. Brooks, the "hero" character, is emotionally complex, but eternally falls on optimism. And his comrades generally seem to share an upbeat nature. Near future southern California is hot, plagued by fires, and dealing with the fallout of MAGA racists and their "plut", cryptocurrency allies, a broader swath of "decent people", and the leftist activists that are trying to create change in the face of climate catastrophe that leaves many internally displaced persons. A few characters add some political complexity, but there's an overall "us vs them" equation that lays the foundation for the book. It reads like a few others of Doctorow's books (Walkaway in mind), where there's a constant back and forth between positive, hopeful movement, and reactionary destruction. It shares with other solarpunk (1) a lot of talk about solar and carbon neutral or negative technologies, and (2) a general optimism in the face of difficult climate situations. Unlike much other solarpunk, this isn't a further off future, where significant transformation has changed political, social and cultural grounds. It is instead a near future, where the political debates remain (realistically, I think) in relatively similar terrain. Unlike "The Ministry for the Future", Doctorow doesn't get lost in scalar storytelling ranging from micro to macro transformation. Instead, the focus is on the change that could be made at a small level, in one place, by a group of committed activists. I think the book is meant to leave you hopeful, and I can see how it could do. However, unlike The Ministry for the Future, Becky Chambers' novels, or other Solarpunk, this book feels like it lands solidly in more realistic science fiction. It was a rich romp with some fun ideas (I love the notion that AI combined with open source does something useful and makes it possible for lay people to collectively redesign neighborhoods and communities) and, I think, a decent read on near future politics. And, as I often do, I find myself appreciating Doctorow's political bent, including his thorough investigations into "plut" culture and the cryptocurrency political hellscape.
I like Cory Doctorow's blog and share his politics. I backed The Lost Cause on Kickstarter. There are some cool things about the book, but overall I wouldn't recommend it.
It's shocking to read "MAGA" in fiction. Most sci-fi authors of today grew up on sci-fi written before 1980, and that is what we think sci-fi is. When those works were originally written, they probably referred to politics of the day. (Every book from that period seems to be a meditation on nuclear war.) But their settings and themes became the settings and themes of sci-fi. No history after 1980 can be included in a sci-fi, because it was never included in the books we grew up with.
It's fantastic that The Lost Cause breaks through this and more authors should do it.
It's clearly very political and that's great too. Sci-fi is supposed to say something.
The main ideological …
I like Cory Doctorow's blog and share his politics. I backed The Lost Cause on Kickstarter. There are some cool things about the book, but overall I wouldn't recommend it.
It's shocking to read "MAGA" in fiction. Most sci-fi authors of today grew up on sci-fi written before 1980, and that is what we think sci-fi is. When those works were originally written, they probably referred to politics of the day. (Every book from that period seems to be a meditation on nuclear war.) But their settings and themes became the settings and themes of sci-fi. No history after 1980 can be included in a sci-fi, because it was never included in the books we grew up with.
It's fantastic that The Lost Cause breaks through this and more authors should do it.
It's clearly very political and that's great too. Sci-fi is supposed to say something.
The main ideological argument of the book is that leftists are hot brown chicks who cook exotic vegan dishes, while the conservatives are fat old white dudes. We can assume they cook bland dry burgers.
Oh, and the conservatives have a beloved sci-fi book that is a wish-fulfillment fantasy that makes them sound like the good guys. So silly to have a book like that, right? Haha!
In the conservatives' book they end up heroically gunning down leftists. While in The Lost Cause the leftists only almost end up heroically gunning down the conservatives. The two sides are not the same!
Both of these phenomena (appeal to hot chicks and claiming to act differently while acting the same) are so blatant. Maybe it's intentional? But to what end?
I have read a total two explicitly political sci-fi stories, The Lost Cause and William Morris's [b:News from Nowhere|189746|News from Nowhere|William Morris|https://i.gr-assets.com/images/S/compressed.photo.goodreads.com/books/1172550120l/189746.SY75.jpg|13352231]. It's weird that hot chicks are also a core argument of Morris's.
The book has a few weird quirks. An unsettling amount of alcohol is consumed without any issue. Just non-stop drinking and pot. Is that normal? Am I just old? A significant fraction of the book is dedicated to food too. The dishes sound great and I would love to try them all. But I'm not sure all the detail about them helps the book. I think the argument is "We should let in more immigrants because they bring great food." Which I don't think is a great argument. (Should we reject immigrants that lack a tasty cuisine?) But it can also read as "Look at how many fancy dishes I know!"
Some of the leftist cultural markers are so over the top it's funny. Sex in masks! "Someone gave me a vegan empanada." "I was so ready to tear down my fucking house." As a 40+ Hungarian living in Hungary I can't directly connect with these tribal markers. I accept that tribalism is necessary for building a community. But I would have preferred a book that doesn't simply show that leftists are better and leave it at that. What if the conservatives were hotter? If they had better food? If they were nicer?
This electrifying future landscape is powered by excess solar energy on sunny days where the supply outpaces demand. Doctrow delves the reader into a thrilling struggle between the forces of compassion, greed, and egotism. Full of fun twists, this novel presents a vision of the next century that is at once hopeful and harrowing. Good read.
This is an excellent speculative novel that addresses the challenges of climate change, how people with the same aims can struggle to agree on means, and what happens when we win meaningful change.
