The Origins of Totalitarianism, published in 1951, was Hannah Arendt's first major work, wherein she describes and analyzes Nazism and Stalinism as the major totalitarian political movements of the first half of the 20th century.
I cannot express how much I love and respect Arendt's ideas while hating the convoluted way she writes in run-on sentences that need to be deciphered like it's the Rosetta Stone. In spite of its flaws and some of the logical holes many a scholar have since pointed out, it was an icon of a publication as well as the beginning of extremely important scholarly work on fascism, antisemitism, etc.
Review of 'The Origins of Totalitarianism' on 'Goodreads'
4 stars
Upon coming across several references to her work in [b:L'ère de l'individu tyran|55626615|L'ère de l'individu tyran La fin d'un monde commun (essai français) (French Edition)|Éric Sadin|https://i.gr-assets.com/images/S/compressed.photo.goodreads.com/books/1602429535l/55626615.SX50.jpg|86747524] (2021) by Éric Sadin and [b:The Lonely Century|50695158|The Lonely Century How to Restore Human Connection in a World That's Pulling Apart|Noreena Hertz|https://i.gr-assets.com/images/S/compressed.photo.goodreads.com/books/1586828936l/50695158.SY75.jpg|75721792] (2021) by Noreena Hertz, I had to read Hannah Arendt’s The Origins of Totalitarianism (1951) myself. It took me a while to get into the narrative, but eventually I was drawn into her history and philosophical view of antisemitism, imperialism and totalitarianism.
With the atrocities during the Second World War in mind, Arendt describes how 19th- and 20th-century Europe became a breeding ground for feelings of nationalism and racism. The first part of her book is reserved for the history of Jews in Europe and the rise of antisemitism, after which she continues with European imperialism, both in …
Upon coming across several references to her work in [b:L'ère de l'individu tyran|55626615|L'ère de l'individu tyran La fin d'un monde commun (essai français) (French Edition)|Éric Sadin|https://i.gr-assets.com/images/S/compressed.photo.goodreads.com/books/1602429535l/55626615.SX50.jpg|86747524] (2021) by Éric Sadin and [b:The Lonely Century|50695158|The Lonely Century How to Restore Human Connection in a World That's Pulling Apart|Noreena Hertz|https://i.gr-assets.com/images/S/compressed.photo.goodreads.com/books/1586828936l/50695158.SY75.jpg|75721792] (2021) by Noreena Hertz, I had to read Hannah Arendt’s The Origins of Totalitarianism (1951) myself. It took me a while to get into the narrative, but eventually I was drawn into her history and philosophical view of antisemitism, imperialism and totalitarianism.
With the atrocities during the Second World War in mind, Arendt describes how 19th- and 20th-century Europe became a breeding ground for feelings of nationalism and racism. The first part of her book is reserved for the history of Jews in Europe and the rise of antisemitism, after which she continues with European imperialism, both in the colonies (notably the Scramble for Africa) and on the continent itself (pan-Germanism and -Slavism). The parts contain a high information density and gradually build up to the climax of the book: the origins of totalitarianism.
I knew little about the differences between authoritarianism, despotism and totalitarianism. The totalitarian state, Arendt explains, is a state in appearance only: once in power, the ‘movement’ (not: party) stands above the state and the people and no longer truly identifies itself with their needs, ‘ready to sacrifice both for the sake of its ideology’. This is true for Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union under Stalin, but not for Fascist Italy or Francoist Spain, for example. Under the Nazi regime, the ‘supreme’ law was formed by the ‘will’ of their Führer, rather than by his exact orders. Terror is at the heart:
Terror becomes total when it becomes independent of all opposition; it rules supreme when nobody any longer stands in its way. If lawfulness is the essence of non-tyrannical government and lawlessness is the essence of tyranny, then terror is the essence of totalitarian domination.
In the final chapter, Arendt shows how isolation and loneliness are at the source of terror. Totalitarian regimes will seek to destroy human dignity because it implies the recognition of fellow human beings as subjects. In this respect, Hertz did well to ground her plea against loneliness in Arendt’s seminal work. The Origins of Totalitarianism may not be a page-turner, but I learned a lot from it and it puts novels like George Orwell’s [b:Animal Farm|56730514|Animal Farm|George Orwell|https://i.gr-assets.com/images/S/compressed.photo.goodreads.com/books/1611001402l/56730514.SY75.jpg|2207778] and Jung Chang’s [b:Wild Swans|1848|Wild Swans Three Daughters of China|Jung Chang|https://i.gr-assets.com/images/S/compressed.photo.goodreads.com/books/1440643710l/1848.SX50.jpg|2969000] in a new perspective.
Review of 'The origins of totalitarianism' on 'Goodreads'
4 stars
The book is very uneven. Some parts are exhilarating to read and intellectually provacative. Others are plodding and dull enough to serve as a soporific. Argument seems to be made too often by assertion, with a few supporting quotes from arbitrary places as weak buttresses for weighty premises.
Nevertheless the analysis of the principles of totalitarianism and their relationship to loneliness and a sort of monomanaical obsession with developing the consequences of an ideology are fascinating reading, as are the portions dealing with the relationship of imperialism and industrial capitalism to the development of fascist ideas.
Ultimately the book strikes me as an excellent essay collection, straddled somewhere between history and philosophy.
Review of 'The origins of totalitarianism' on 'Goodreads'
4 stars
The two examples of totalitarianism Earth has on record are the only ones from which we can generalize. While I'm wary of the accuracy of a 2-data point trend line, Hannah Arendt has some interesting observations that serve as warning signs for our society today. Rather than fixating on words labeling ideas, such as "socialism" or "nationalist," Arendt analyzes societal trends that seem to incubate totalitarianism: racism, absolutism, single-party political environments.
Interestingly, totalitarianism doesn't formally replace the previous system in which it metastasized. This book makes me simultaneously realize I need to read more fundamental political theory (Hobbes, Marx) and grow skeptical that any ideologically driven system has all the answers.
Nazi leadership believed: "The more accurately we recognize and observe the laws of nature and life, ... so much the more do we conform to the will of the Almighty. The more insight we have into the will of …
The two examples of totalitarianism Earth has on record are the only ones from which we can generalize. While I'm wary of the accuracy of a 2-data point trend line, Hannah Arendt has some interesting observations that serve as warning signs for our society today. Rather than fixating on words labeling ideas, such as "socialism" or "nationalist," Arendt analyzes societal trends that seem to incubate totalitarianism: racism, absolutism, single-party political environments.
Interestingly, totalitarianism doesn't formally replace the previous system in which it metastasized. This book makes me simultaneously realize I need to read more fundamental political theory (Hobbes, Marx) and grow skeptical that any ideologically driven system has all the answers.
Nazi leadership believed: "The more accurately we recognize and observe the laws of nature and life, ... so much the more do we conform to the will of the Almighty. The more insight we have into the will of the Almighty, the greater will be our successes." The idea was adapted by Stalin in support of dialectical materialism, and the regime practiced the theory that the masses ignore the facts before their eyes, and follow only their imaginations, the best of which are the most consistent. So consistency of ideology wins out over facts. This sounds disturbingly familiar to me, living in the USA today, with the perceived tension between evidence-based approaches and "it will all work out if we just double down on this idea."
Finally, totalitarianism was only possible after the people were insulated from non-sympathizers by the complete politicization of every area of live. Things previously not considered "political" became arms of the ruling party. The party explicitly duplicated Civic and Professional groups in order to undermine and replace the originals, then pushed the idea that "Everything outside the movement is dying," and the only way forward is through the party. All of this is easily attained through Facebook and our filter bubbles now.
While we're still missing a single party system, the US is not far removed from the ideal growth requirements for totalitarianism. It's a reminder to stay vigilant: - seek out friends with viewpoints different from my own, and engage thoughtfully with them, - consume information with an active attention to how it can be manipulated and skewed, and - evaluate the actions that seem necessary from my most solidly held ideals in the light of whether they dehumanize others.
Review of 'The origins of totalitarianism' on 'Goodreads'
4 stars
What a horrible time to be reading this! Which, of course, was why I read it.
Though this analysis of late nineteenth-/early twentieth-century history doesn't quite run parallel to today, it's hard to keep the mind from wandering to current events, comparing and contrasting. It's distracting. That constant pulling away, coupled with academic prose, meant for a lot of retracing steps to find where I went off the rails.
