The Origins of Totalitarianism begins with the rise of anti-Semitism in central and western Europe in the 1800s and continues with an examination of European colonial imperialism from 1884 to the outbreak of World War I. Arendt explores the institutions and operations of totalitarian movements, focusing on the two genuine forms of totalitarian government in our time—Nazi Germany and Stalinist Russia—which she adroitly recognizes were two sides of the same coin, rather than opposing philosophies of Right and Left. From this vantage point, she discusses the evolution of classes into masses, the role of propaganda in dealing with the nontotalitarian world, the use of terror, and the nature of isolation and loneliness as preconditions for total domination.
Review of 'The origins of totalitarianism' on 'Goodreads'
4 stars
The book is very uneven. Some parts are exhilarating to read and intellectually provacative. Others are plodding and dull enough to serve as a soporific. Argument seems to be made too often by assertion, with a few supporting quotes from arbitrary places as weak buttresses for weighty premises.
Nevertheless the analysis of the principles of totalitarianism and their relationship to loneliness and a sort of monomanaical obsession with developing the consequences of an ideology are fascinating reading, as are the portions dealing with the relationship of imperialism and industrial capitalism to the development of fascist ideas.
Ultimately the book strikes me as an excellent essay collection, straddled somewhere between history and philosophy.
Review of 'The origins of totalitarianism' on 'Goodreads'
4 stars
The two examples of totalitarianism Earth has on record are the only ones from which we can generalize. While I'm wary of the accuracy of a 2-data point trend line, Hannah Arendt has some interesting observations that serve as warning signs for our society today. Rather than fixating on words labeling ideas, such as "socialism" or "nationalist," Arendt analyzes societal trends that seem to incubate totalitarianism: racism, absolutism, single-party political environments.
Interestingly, totalitarianism doesn't formally replace the previous system in which it metastasized. This book makes me simultaneously realize I need to read more fundamental political theory (Hobbes, Marx) and grow skeptical that any ideologically driven system has all the answers.
Nazi leadership believed: "The more accurately we recognize and observe the laws of nature and life, ... so much the more do we conform to the will of the Almighty. The more insight we have into the will of …
The two examples of totalitarianism Earth has on record are the only ones from which we can generalize. While I'm wary of the accuracy of a 2-data point trend line, Hannah Arendt has some interesting observations that serve as warning signs for our society today. Rather than fixating on words labeling ideas, such as "socialism" or "nationalist," Arendt analyzes societal trends that seem to incubate totalitarianism: racism, absolutism, single-party political environments.
Interestingly, totalitarianism doesn't formally replace the previous system in which it metastasized. This book makes me simultaneously realize I need to read more fundamental political theory (Hobbes, Marx) and grow skeptical that any ideologically driven system has all the answers.
Nazi leadership believed: "The more accurately we recognize and observe the laws of nature and life, ... so much the more do we conform to the will of the Almighty. The more insight we have into the will of the Almighty, the greater will be our successes." The idea was adapted by Stalin in support of dialectical materialism, and the regime practiced the theory that the masses ignore the facts before their eyes, and follow only their imaginations, the best of which are the most consistent. So consistency of ideology wins out over facts. This sounds disturbingly familiar to me, living in the USA today, with the perceived tension between evidence-based approaches and "it will all work out if we just double down on this idea."
Finally, totalitarianism was only possible after the people were insulated from non-sympathizers by the complete politicization of every area of live. Things previously not considered "political" became arms of the ruling party. The party explicitly duplicated Civic and Professional groups in order to undermine and replace the originals, then pushed the idea that "Everything outside the movement is dying," and the only way forward is through the party. All of this is easily attained through Facebook and our filter bubbles now.
While we're still missing a single party system, the US is not far removed from the ideal growth requirements for totalitarianism. It's a reminder to stay vigilant: - seek out friends with viewpoints different from my own, and engage thoughtfully with them, - consume information with an active attention to how it can be manipulated and skewed, and - evaluate the actions that seem necessary from my most solidly held ideals in the light of whether they dehumanize others.
Review of 'The origins of totalitarianism' on 'Goodreads'
4 stars
What a horrible time to be reading this! Which, of course, was why I read it.
Though this analysis of late nineteenth-/early twentieth-century history doesn't quite run parallel to today, it's hard to keep the mind from wandering to current events, comparing and contrasting. It's distracting. That constant pulling away, coupled with academic prose, meant for a lot of retracing steps to find where I went off the rails.
