James Cridland's reading reviewed Manhunt by James L. Swanson
Review of 'Manhunt' on 'Goodreads'
4 stars
This is a strange book - partly because, as a Brit and Australian, it seems as if I am peering in on another country's holy relic. As if to underline that, while this book came out in 2006, it is written in an incredibly old-fashioned style that is almost reminiscent of the texts that I read during my Catholic education. The purported dialogue in this book is fanciful and flowery, but then, so is the rest of it. There's probably a good reason that the book cover looks as old-fashioned as it reads.
Putting the strange style aside, the story - which I was wholly ignorant of, despite visiting the Ford Theatre on a visit to DC - is a good one, and told well, with a good pace and interesting detail. It would have been helpful to have put it into context for the modern reader, and in a …
This is a strange book - partly because, as a Brit and Australian, it seems as if I am peering in on another country's holy relic. As if to underline that, while this book came out in 2006, it is written in an incredibly old-fashioned style that is almost reminiscent of the texts that I read during my Catholic education. The purported dialogue in this book is fanciful and flowery, but then, so is the rest of it. There's probably a good reason that the book cover looks as old-fashioned as it reads.
Putting the strange style aside, the story - which I was wholly ignorant of, despite visiting the Ford Theatre on a visit to DC - is a good one, and told well, with a good pace and interesting detail. It would have been helpful to have put it into context for the modern reader, and in a more accessible style.
I leave it wondering what the point of writing this book was. As Swanson says at the beginning of the bibliography section, "the literature of the Lincoln assassination is vast, and I do not pretend to catalog it here", which you could first reply with "who the hell talks like that in a book written in 2006?" and, more to the point, "if there are so many books on the subject, what does this one bring to the party?"
I feel more educated on reading - and you do get a good understanding of who John Wilkes Booth was (though really very little criticism of his racism). Perhaps this might be a set book for American schools. If you can stomach the antiquated style, it's a worthwhile read. Not sure I'm in it for the sequel, though.