RexLegendi reviewed Superintelligence by Nick Bostrom
Review of 'Superintelligence' on 'Goodreads'
4 stars
Fancied Harari’s [b:Homo Deus|31138556|Homo Deus A History of Tomorrow|Yuval Noah Harari|https://i.gr-assets.com/images/S/compressed.photo.goodreads.com/books/1468760805l/31138556.SY75.jpg|45087110]? If you’re up for a deeper conversation on the future of brain emulation and machine intelligence, be sure to read Superintelligence.
Nick Bostrom (1973) discusses the likelihood and risks of superintelligence – any intellect that greatly exceeds the cognitive performance of humans in virtually all domains of interest – from a technological and philosophical point of view. Of course, even the director of the Future of Humanity Institute at the University of Oxford cannot predict the future (‘many of the points made in this book are probably wrong’), but he does set out interesting thoughts. As a non-technical layman, I found it difficult to assess the probability of certain scenarios, but they gave me some insight nonetheless.
There are different paths to enhance intelligence, such as brain emulation or biological cognition, but Bostrom …
Fancied Harari’s [b:Homo Deus|31138556|Homo Deus A History of Tomorrow|Yuval Noah Harari|https://i.gr-assets.com/images/S/compressed.photo.goodreads.com/books/1468760805l/31138556.SY75.jpg|45087110]? If you’re up for a deeper conversation on the future of brain emulation and machine intelligence, be sure to read Superintelligence.
Nick Bostrom (1973) discusses the likelihood and risks of superintelligence – any intellect that greatly exceeds the cognitive performance of humans in virtually all domains of interest – from a technological and philosophical point of view. Of course, even the director of the Future of Humanity Institute at the University of Oxford cannot predict the future (‘many of the points made in this book are probably wrong’), but he does set out interesting thoughts. As a non-technical layman, I found it difficult to assess the probability of certain scenarios, but they gave me some insight nonetheless.
There are different paths to enhance intelligence, such as brain emulation or biological cognition, but Bostrom is most keen on machine intelligence as the road to superintelligence; the possibility of a singularity runs like a thread through his narrative. Bostrom is quick to explain we should not try to anthropomorphise in any way, as too often happens in science fiction.
There is no reason to expect a generic AI to be motivated by love or hate or pride or other such common human sentiments: these complex adaptations would require deliberate expensive effort to recreate in AIs.
The author then describes different scenarios in case a non-human superintelligence emerges. According to his orthogonality thesis, such an intelligence could have a huge range of goals. The next question would therefore be how a superintelligence could still be kept under control. Bostrom distinguishes between capability control methods and motivation control methods. His confidence in the former kind is low, so he delves deeper into the latter. Science fiction readers will remember Isaac Asimov’s laws ([b:I, Robot|40226738|I, Robot (Robot, #0.1)|Isaac Asimov|https://i.gr-assets.com/images/S/compressed.photo.goodreads.com/books/1536494104l/40226738.SY75.jpg|1796026]), as Bostrom does himself:
Embarrassingly for our species, Asimov’s laws remained state-of-the-art for over half a century: this despite obvious problems with the approach, some of which are explored in Asimov’s own writings (Asimov probably having formulated the laws in the first place precisely so that they would fail in interesting ways, providing fertile plot complications for his stories).
In the final chapters, Bostrom goes more into detail. I was not necessarily interested in his take on the future of our economy or labour market, but I certainly appreciated the author’s thoughts on the value-loading problem and the impersonal perspective, which includes considering future (unborn) generations. Bostrom’s ideas on the common good principle and the importance of collaboration bring to mind Mariana Mazzucato’s political economy ([b:Mission Economy|55742686|Mission Economy A Moonshot Guide to Changing Capitalism|Mariana Mazzucato|https://i.gr-assets.com/images/S/compressed.photo.goodreads.com/books/1603166951l/55742686.SY75.jpg|73121548]).
Finally, Superintelligence offers a nice background for reading science fiction stories. I have a more technical understanding now of novels like [b:2001: A Space Odyssey|46026742|2001 A Space Odyssey (Space Odyssey, #1)|Arthur C. Clarke|https://i.gr-assets.com/images/S/compressed.photo.goodreads.com/books/1558985212l/46026742.SY75.jpg|208362] and [b:Klara and the Sun|55111243|Klara and the Sun|Kazuo Ishiguro|https://i.gr-assets.com/images/S/compressed.photo.goodreads.com/books/1622500451l/55111243.SY75.jpg|84460796].
Next on my list is Mustafa Suleyman’s [b:The Coming Wave|90590134|The Coming Wave Technology, Power, and the Twenty-first Century's Greatest Dilemma|Mustafa Suleyman|https://i.gr-assets.com/images/S/compressed.photo.goodreads.com/books/1685351813l/90590134.SY75.jpg|114865406].