Freakonomics

Paperback, 336 pages

English language

Published April 6, 2006 by Penguin.

ISBN:
978-0-14-101901-7
Copied ISBN!
OCLC Number:
851801445

View on OpenLibrary

(45 reviews)

What do estate agents and the Ku Klux Klan have in common? Why do drug dealers live with their mothers? How can your name affect how well you do in life?

The answer: Freakonomics. It's at the heart of everything we do and the things that affect us daily, from sex to crime, parenting to politics, fat to cheating, fear to traffic jams. And it's all about using information about the world around us to get to the heart of what's really happening under the surface of everyday life.

Now updated with the authors' New York Times columns and blog entries, this cult bestseller will show you how, by unravelling your life's secret codes, you can discover a totally new way of seeing the world. --back cover

24 editions

Review of 'Freakonomics - A Rogue Economist Explores The Hidden Side Of Everything, Revised and Expanded Edition' on 'Goodreads'

I started off really liking this and found it very thought provoking. However it gets bogged down in a couple of significant but overlong explorations on education and names and this tends to lose the 'punchiness' of the initial approach. Good to make you think in different ways and to stress the need for caution in any analysis, but left me feeling it could have had much greater scope.

Review of 'Freakonomics' on 'Goodreads'

Statistically seeing the world is a very fascinating approach to break down social issues and common wisdom. This is the book that provide how to see the world in this way. Through various examples, the author presented ways to apply statistical tools and methods to different topics of wide-spread interest. Although the conclusion is either mind-blowing or anticipated. Thinking purely from statistics and the power of it are the true prizes of this book.

Review of 'Freakonomics' on 'Goodreads'

It's interesting, but has a basic problem. One of the premises of the book is that you should question conventional wisdom - that 'what everyone knows' tends to be glib and simplistic and could be just plain wrong. But the examples of his own theories, though they may spring from a rigorous methodology, once distilled into a chapter of a book become glib and simplistic. And could well be just plain wrong.

avatar for squaregoldfish

rated it

avatar for ray1729

rated it

avatar for Neorxenawang

rated it

avatar for deuce

rated it

avatar for vertis

rated it

avatar for arensb

rated it

avatar for ZenArtist

rated it

avatar for Eldaerenth

rated it

avatar for schellenberg

rated it

avatar for guillevg

rated it

avatar for gregputzel

rated it

avatar for Nolotec

rated it

avatar for LKBM

rated it

avatar for camdotbio

rated it

avatar for Ellemir

rated it

avatar for ghostmodernist

rated it

avatar for geoffrey

rated it

avatar for Ascapola

rated it

avatar for FernGirl

rated it

avatar for ion

rated it

avatar for trueheresy

rated it

avatar for Cheynio

rated it

avatar for wordeater

rated it

avatar for LuisVilla

rated it

avatar for jbeimler

rated it

avatar for vincekd

rated it

avatar for curtdubya

rated it

avatar for psilotum

rated it

avatar for hackeryarn

rated it

avatar for lsimoneau

rated it

avatar for Darthemed

rated it

avatar for Feneric

rated it

avatar for lucasrizoli

rated it

avatar for watchsmart

rated it

avatar for Eldenico

rated it

avatar for Tamino

rated it

avatar for TrygveKalland

rated it

avatar for ranjit

rated it

avatar for alanz

rated it