Scott Lougheed reviewed 1Q84 by Haruki Murakami
Review of '1Q84' on 'Goodreads'
3 stars
I have adored Murakami’s work immensely in the past but 1Q84 was a bit of a meandering slog. A bit clumsy, repetitive, and perhaps needlessly drawn out. I’m beginning to believe that Murakami is at his best when his writing is short.
This is a classic conundrum I sometimes find myself in. Is my distaste by design? Were the aspects of the book I dislike deliberately put there to antagonize me, or perhaps to immerse me in the feelings and experience of the characters? Or was it just an oddly self-indulgent piece of writing with no regard for its reader? I love the often-surreal and slightly mystical stream of consciousness narrative Murakami tends toward. However, to the extent that was present here, it was overwrought and overshadowed by so many problems that begin to take hold in the second book.
The portrayal of women, for example, is profoundly unflattering and …
I have adored Murakami’s work immensely in the past but 1Q84 was a bit of a meandering slog. A bit clumsy, repetitive, and perhaps needlessly drawn out. I’m beginning to believe that Murakami is at his best when his writing is short.
This is a classic conundrum I sometimes find myself in. Is my distaste by design? Were the aspects of the book I dislike deliberately put there to antagonize me, or perhaps to immerse me in the feelings and experience of the characters? Or was it just an oddly self-indulgent piece of writing with no regard for its reader? I love the often-surreal and slightly mystical stream of consciousness narrative Murakami tends toward. However, to the extent that was present here, it was overwrought and overshadowed by so many problems that begin to take hold in the second book.
The portrayal of women, for example, is profoundly unflattering and borderline misogynistic. Is that a projection of Murakami’s genuine perspective or is Murakami merely the meta-author of a story written by Tengo and thus should we read it as the manifestation of Tengo’s sexualizing, misogynistic gaze? WHO KNOWS!
I’m normally up to be confronted and antagonized by an artist and their work, but I want the takeaway and the experience to pay off. Unfortunately this did not hit that mark.