By all accounts, Simon Basset is on the verge of proposing to his best friend's sister--the lovely and almost-on-the-shelf--Daphne Bridgerton. But the two of the know the truth--it's all an elaborate ruse to keep Simon free from marriage-minded society mothers. And as for Daphne, surely she will attract some worthy suitors now that it seems a duke has declared her desirable....
After hearing a discussion of the source books for Bridgerton, I decided I should probably know the underlying original material. It was the kind of soap opera I expected. And that's fine, if you like that. But I watch Bridgerton for the costumes mostly--which is something less well served by the book.
I was curious to read this book because of the Netflix series. I haven't watched the show but I've heard some blurbs about it. And, I had fun reading it, for the most part. I thought the build-up romance was well done in the beginning. I enjoyed the funny dialogues between the two main protagonists. But there was something weird about the female main character. Daphne was portrayed as being smart for the local regency standards. We hear her saying that she was raised with 4 brothers, so she knew everything about rakes and swear words. She's in her 20's, and then we find out that she didn't know how babies are made? And she didn't have a clue what happens to "consummate a marriage"? That threw me off a little bit, suddenly she wasn't as smart as I'd thought. And the conundrum of the Duke, Simon, falling for her …
I was curious to read this book because of the Netflix series. I haven't watched the show but I've heard some blurbs about it. And, I had fun reading it, for the most part. I thought the build-up romance was well done in the beginning. I enjoyed the funny dialogues between the two main protagonists. But there was something weird about the female main character. Daphne was portrayed as being smart for the local regency standards. We hear her saying that she was raised with 4 brothers, so she knew everything about rakes and swear words. She's in her 20's, and then we find out that she didn't know how babies are made? And she didn't have a clue what happens to "consummate a marriage"? That threw me off a little bit, suddenly she wasn't as smart as I'd thought. And the conundrum of the Duke, Simon, falling for her and not wanting to marry her because of his issues with siring heirs that was also related to his issues with his late father... anyway. I prefer historical romance when the characters break with the status quo of the time. When they question cultural norms. And in this one the female character, Daphne, achieves her dream of marrying and having a family, changing the Duke's opinion about being father. They live happy ever after. The end. So, I was enjyoing it in the beginning but then it turned to be bleh in the end.
Two adults that, by all accounts, should be a bit more mature, acting more like teens. Both should consider serious counseling, to the point that I have a hard time believing the happy ending. Some things that are quite contrived (I know, books are contrived, but they don't have to feel contrived).
Review of 'The Duke And I. TV Tie-In' on 'Goodreads'
4 stars
Why yes, I will have a little cheese with my romance. Thank you. Give me a double-helping. I'm a marshmallow. Crusty on the outside, and gooey and warm inside.
Julia Quinn writes great historical romances. I accidentally started with book 2 in the series, and have worked my way back to book 1. I will definitely continue my journey with the Bridgertons. They are fun. You know there will be troubles. Misunderstandings, tears. Family meddling where they shouldn't be. But lots of love, and always my HEA. I gotta have that. This one is the eldest daughter, Daphne. Pretty, but in a regular person way. Smart. Outspoken. A little flawed. My favorite kind of heroine! Simon is a little bossy, smart, funny, and flawed as well. My favorite kind of hero. Add up all the historical romance tropes and you have this book, but in the best possible way.
If …
Why yes, I will have a little cheese with my romance. Thank you. Give me a double-helping. I'm a marshmallow. Crusty on the outside, and gooey and warm inside.
Julia Quinn writes great historical romances. I accidentally started with book 2 in the series, and have worked my way back to book 1. I will definitely continue my journey with the Bridgertons. They are fun. You know there will be troubles. Misunderstandings, tears. Family meddling where they shouldn't be. But lots of love, and always my HEA. I gotta have that. This one is the eldest daughter, Daphne. Pretty, but in a regular person way. Smart. Outspoken. A little flawed. My favorite kind of heroine! Simon is a little bossy, smart, funny, and flawed as well. My favorite kind of hero. Add up all the historical romance tropes and you have this book, but in the best possible way.
If I wrote historical romances, I would hope they would turn out like this. 4 stars.
Review of 'The Duke And I. TV Tie-In' on 'Goodreads'
3 stars
I wasn't entirely sure what to expect going into The Duke and I. I'm not a romance aficionado, but I was (obviously) definitely interested in exploring the genre and this turned out to be a pretty perfect not-quite-introduction (as I'd already read Jeannie Lin's Butterfly Swords) to both the genre and the Bridgerton series itself.
Daphne is sweet, kind, and extremely likable, while Simon, though carrying what I imagine is fairly typical dark, brooding romantic hero torment, is sympathetic enough that you're willing to forgive him brief lapses into jerkitude (especially given that he apologizes later). The overwhelming impression as soon as you start the book and experience Simon and Daphne's first meeting is that everything about it (them, the narrative, everything!) is just so charming and though things take darker turns later in the book, that charm never goes away. And, for the most part, the problems …
I wasn't entirely sure what to expect going into The Duke and I. I'm not a romance aficionado, but I was (obviously) definitely interested in exploring the genre and this turned out to be a pretty perfect not-quite-introduction (as I'd already read Jeannie Lin's Butterfly Swords) to both the genre and the Bridgerton series itself.
Daphne is sweet, kind, and extremely likable, while Simon, though carrying what I imagine is fairly typical dark, brooding romantic hero torment, is sympathetic enough that you're willing to forgive him brief lapses into jerkitude (especially given that he apologizes later). The overwhelming impression as soon as you start the book and experience Simon and Daphne's first meeting is that everything about it (them, the narrative, everything!) is just so charming and though things take darker turns later in the book, that charm never goes away. And, for the most part, the problems that the two encounter in their relationship are actually handled well, with wrongs on both sides being acknowledged and Daphne granted agency in their dealings.
In addition to making you care about Daphne/Simon and wanting things to work out for them, the main thing that The Duke and I needed to do was introduce you to the Bridgertons so that you'd want to keep reading on about Daphne's numerous siblings. I think almost more than any other book in the series, this first one does so much to show you who the family itself is and put their various personalities and foibles on display. And it does so to such great effect -- also involving Daphne's brothers directly in the plot -- that I pretty immediately began anticipating various characters' own novels.
Which means that overall it did its job well, and in and of itself is a strong book, towards the high end of the middle, if I were to rank the entire series.