A Spell for Chameleon

344 pages

English language

Published Feb. 5, 1979 by Del Ray.

ISBN:
978-0-345-25855-7
Copied ISBN!
OCLC Number:
2798214

View on OpenLibrary

3 stars (59 reviews)

Xanth was the enchanted land where magic ruled - where every citizen had a special spell only he could cast. It was a land of centaurs, dragons and basiliks.But poor Bink alone had no magic. And unless he got some - and fast - he would be exiled.

The Good Magician Humfrey was convined that Bink did indeed have magic, magic as powerful as any possessed by the King or Good Magician Humfrey himself. But no one could fathom the nature of Bink's very special magic. Bink was in despair. This was worse than having no magic at all...and he would still be exiled.

18 editions

Review of 'A Spell for Chameleon' on 'Storygraph'

1 star

A Spell for Chameleon attempts to be a fantasy about appearances, assumptions, history, and the importance of treating people fairly. Unfortunately it is so agonizingly sexist that it can barely go ten pages without insulting women or upholding toxic masculinity.

I used to love this series, and I’d read up as far as A Swell Foop before stopping. But now that I’m mostly out of the toxic, sexist miasma of my childhood and teen years, the problems in this book are apparent from the first page. Bink has everything (telling us he’s smart, good looking, amazing in every way), except for a finger he lost in a childhood incident made worse by internalized toxic masculinity and fear making him hide the damage until it was too late to be fixed by magic, and his apparent lack of magic in a world which demands that one’s magical talent appear by age …

Review of 'A Spell for Chameleon' on 'Goodreads'

2 stars

Watched Deadpool 2 recently, and it having a character who has a power based on luck reminded me of this book. I realized I haven't read it since I was a teen so I got super excited about reading it again.

Some of the aspects of the book that I liked as a teen I still enjoyed, but its soo sexist. The amount of hate the author has towards women is barely veiled. At one point the author has the line "Cameleon, like most girls, had to answer the calls of nature often." And that's just one of the ones I wrote down.

So yea, I gave it a couple stars cause it's a neat story still, but ugh.

Review of 'A Spell for Chameleon' on 'Goodreads'

3 stars

I was under the impression that these Xanth books were going to be amazing. Other readers have informed me of this, but i went in to the book with no expectations.
While I did like the main character pretty well, I though the book was written to suit 12-year-old boys. I didn't even get a lot of the word puns that this book was supposed to mention, but that could have been because i was reading the book in audio, and not text.
Another thin g irritated me was that it's eally obvious that Piers Anthony doesn't really like women. They all seem to be airheads with big boobs.

Review of 'A Spell for Chameleon' on 'Goodreads'

3 stars

It is an interesting world, and interesting premise, but wow, what a terrible world for women Anthony has created. For a light fantasy about a magical world, the sexism creates an ugly shadow across the book. Really, the so called rape trial (yes, in a fantasy novel) is gob-smacking.

I love the Incarnations of Immortality series. This was the first Xanth I've read. I might try a few more and see, but probably won't rush into them right away.

Review of 'A Spell for Chameleon' on 'Goodreads'

2 stars

This series made the big list of best fantasy books that came around a while back. It sounded interesting, so I decided to put it on my reading list. While this was a mistake, I learned a lot from these books: how to write a damn bad style. It is not the story, which is good. It is not the world, which is interesting. It is the execution: the characters are shallow and the writing style leaves something to be desired and if only there were a little less of it at times: Nothing is left to the imagination of the reader. The feelings of character's are named and explained in detail and they tend to change abruptly. The characters appear rough and unpolished. You can still see the good ideas but they don't shine.

Just a couple of quotes to prove my point

"This bothered Bink. He and Fanchon …

avatar for quirk

rated it

3 stars
avatar for deadsuperhero

rated it

4 stars
avatar for moopet

rated it

2 stars
avatar for wetdryvac

rated it

2 stars
avatar for kergoth

rated it

3 stars
avatar for GadgetComa

rated it

3 stars
avatar for windchime

rated it

2 stars
avatar for Ellemir

rated it

3 stars
avatar for Apetz1

rated it

4 stars
avatar for j6m8

rated it

3 stars
avatar for mcchots

rated it

4 stars
avatar for sbobcat

rated it

5 stars
avatar for eoghain

rated it

4 stars
avatar for falcon

rated it

4 stars
avatar for ish-i-ness

rated it

3 stars
avatar for wzhkevin

rated it

4 stars
avatar for dragna

rated it

4 stars
avatar for govmarley

rated it

3 stars
avatar for acaleyn

rated it

3 stars
avatar for JollyRoberts

rated it

5 stars
avatar for cogmer

rated it

2 stars
avatar for gtco

rated it

3 stars
avatar for fryguy451

rated it

3 stars
avatar for kevbot9000

rated it

3 stars
avatar for Nikita

rated it

2 stars
avatar for CatFoodHands

rated it

4 stars
avatar for chaos_angel

rated it

3 stars
avatar for Eldaerenth

rated it

4 stars
avatar for termie

rated it

4 stars
avatar for anonymole

rated it

5 stars
avatar for DaveCline

rated it

5 stars
avatar for fear025

rated it

5 stars
avatar for raconteur

rated it

5 stars
avatar for Darthemed

rated it

3 stars
avatar for ink-and-wax

rated it

3 stars
avatar for Fireblend

rated it

2 stars
avatar for halkeye

rated it

5 stars
avatar for ookla_the_mok

rated it

5 stars
avatar for TheKimmy

rated it

5 stars
avatar for walker

rated it

4 stars
avatar for rmcminds

rated it

2 stars
avatar for anyonas

rated it

5 stars
avatar for bracegirdle

rated it

4 stars
avatar for smyth

rated it

1 star
avatar for fluxmind

rated it

3 stars