And one has a right, perhaps, to feel a satisfaction those content to serve mediocre employers will never know – the satisfaction of being able to say with some reason that one’s efforts, in however modest a way, comprise a contribution to the course of history.
Ever since reading his Never Let Me Go, Kazuo Ishiguro has been one of my favorite authors. I always meant to read his other works but never got the chance until now—and The Remains of the Day did not disappoint. This novel looks at the inner life of a classic English butler, known to the reader only by his surname ‘Stevens’, and his reflections through a weeklong motoring trip in the western English countryside. It explores questions not only of servitude but of how loyalty to our values can corrupt an individual, how much one can trust the narrator when he is not forthcoming, and the pangs of losing the opportunity of what may have been. The richness and complexity of the novel lies largely in the characters—of course, the primary character is Stevens, the butler, but his companion Miss Kenton is also a central figure. Looming in the background, and subtly influencing the way Stevens thinks and how he values his role of a butler, are his former employer, Lord Darlington, his current employer, Mr Farraday, and his father, Mr Stevens Sr. Since this is an experience benefited by not knowing too much from the outset, I can’t say too much, other than the fact that the characters were quite vivid in their characterization and their relationships with each other. Ishiguro is a master of crafting emotion and purpose into his characters, even in seemingly stiff figures like Stevens.Moreover, the novel is told in first-person narration, which is tricky for many writers to pull off—but as usual, Ishiguro does it with ease. He invites the reader into Stevens’s mind, as if one were having a private conversation with the character; all the same, the reader is not entirely privy to Stevens’s thoughts beyond what he decides to convey, and less so the overall course of events that he is relating to us. The more you get into the story, the more intriguing of a narrator Stevens turns out to be. The narrative style reminds me a bit of Japanese novels, where you get long stretches of meandering thoughts from the narrator—but it is also a quintessentially British novel, for obvious reasons. I think Ishiguro himself declines to characterize his novels as epitomizing any country, and so they are universal in a sense, but the classic figure of the butler, he does note, is a very British one.The descriptive elements of the novel were perfect for me—enough to set the scene, but not so much that it becomes overbearing and crowds out the other elements of the novel. Some writers really can’t cap a lid on metaphors and purple prose descriptions that eat up several pages at a time. Ishiguro gets straight to the point, and concisely—the novel is slim, but that hardly stops it from packing quite the emotional punch. As for the plot, it may seem like little happens in the novel, and on one level that is true—the ‘plot’ is largely recollections from Stevens. And yet, one can also say that much happens in the novel—but perhaps it isn’t as directly expressed. The burden of acknowledging and understanding what happens falls to the reader. I won’t deny that it is perhaps a bit mysterious, but this is a novel that will definitely leave you thinking and feeling long after it is over. This is a stunning novel and has cemented Ishiguro in my personal canon.I also highly recommend Salman Rushdie’s review of the novel: ‘Ideals, Ishiguro shows us, can corrupt as thoroughly as cynicism.’Favorite quotes:※ ‘A great butler can only be, surely one who can point to his years of service and say that he has applied his talents to serving a great gentleman — and through the latter, to serving humanity.’※ ‘Mr and Mrs Wakefield, however, appeared to be as keen on the inspection as Mr Farraday and as I went about my business, I would often catch various American exclamations of delight coming from whichever part of the house they had arrived at.’※ ‘Year after year goes by, and nothing gets better. All we do is argue and debate and procrastinate. Any decent idea is amended to ineffectuality by the time it's gone half-way through the various committees it's obliged to pass through. The few people qualified to know what's what are talked to a standstill by ignorant people all around them.’