Essentialism

A very good book that reminds you to focus on the important thing and let the not important things go. Say "no" more often and keep in mind that "less is more". Set boundaries for others that otherwise fill up your day with non-essential stuff.
Loved to read this book, even if it caused me to rethink my own life and what is essentail for me. But I guess this is the sole purpose of this book. Highly recommended reading.

This one felt a lot like a business self-help book, which it is, but also felt like it had a lot of truth to it. Like a true business self-help book though, it contains a lot of "look at this CEO, using our ideas and being successful"-type of paragraphs. I'm never convinced about how true those testimonials can be. You can't just break it down to a few managing techniques and that's it, now your company is successful.

The writing was rather good in most parts, can't deny that. The comparison of sentences describing nonessentialists and essentialists was a bit on the nose, they always rubbed me the wrong way. I get the idea, you don't have to dumb it down even more. Other than that, it's just the idea of minimalism + don't spread out too much, broken down a bit too granular. It's the thoughts that automatically come to mind, when you think about sticking to the essentials, but much longer and in a book. Essentially, essentialism not essentially described.

I don't know if I would recommend this book, it was good, but know what you are getting yourself into.

Some good idea, as long as you have the privilege to implement them. It aunt's you have other people to do the "non-essential" things you deem to be beneath you.

When I was a teenager I worked on my dad's construction crew during the summer. When I complained about the boring stuff I was doing, he said "You want to do exciting stuff, but i need you to do what's needed."

I think there's a reason most of his examples are executives. Quite honestly, most executives could just not show up and still be considered successful. Front line workers still have to actually do the work.

Quick read. Some good reminders and approaches to identifying and preserving what's truly important in life to make the best use of our limited time.

Some dubious references used as evidence but minor offenses and not core to the message.

"Cut out everything that's not essential." That's it. That's the whole book. If the author had taken his own advice, there'd be no book, just a bumper sticker. Still, it did have a surprisingly transformative effect on my life. For one thing, I realized that coffee with friends IS ESSENTIAL to me. And I quit most of my jobs. And I'm evaluating things differently now. And hardly watching any TV or movies. Worth reading if you are not making as much progress as you'd like on the things that are important to you, if you are trying to do everything. Like many of these business books written by men, though, he seems to be in a position to not think of scrubbing the bathroom floor as essential, you know?

Greg McKeown's easy-to-read tome on 'Essentialism' is a field manual - a guide for the busy manager or multi-tasker who is poor at saying no to commitments, and who erroneously believes we can do it all. Reading this book is a valuable use of time for the new manager, or the seasoned leader who finds their success has bred too many different projects.

The overarching frame of reference is that there are two types of managerial and leadership behaviour (the book equivocates management and leadership together) - Essentialist and Non-Essentialist, and that effectiveness is the product only of the former.

The book is well structured and each chapter clearly articulates an aspect of being 'non-essential' - illustrating the consequences with (at times, kitsch) anecdotes. The solution is then provided, in the form of take-away behaviours that can be practised over time.

This book would have been improved with the addition of the following artefacts:

- A wall guide or infographic contrasting the 'Essentialist' and 'Non-Essentialist' behaviours for easy reference and to refer back to

- A maturity model or similar allowing the fledgling leader to self-rate their behaviours

I also found this book lacking in solid empirical research; much of the narrative is fleshed with anecdotal rather than research or evidence-based information, which detracts overall from the credibility of the book.

Greg McKeown's easy-to-read tome on 'Essentialism' is a field manual - a guide for the busy manager or multi-tasker who is poor at saying no to commitments, and who erroneously believes we can do it all. Reading this book is a valuable use of time for the new manager, or the seasoned leader who finds their success has bred too many different projects.

The overarching frame of reference is that there are two types of managerial and leadership behaviour (the book equivocates management and leadership together) - Essentialist and Non-Essentialist, and that effectiveness is the product only of the former.

The book is well structured and each chapter clearly articulates an aspect of being 'non-essential' - illustrating the consequences with (at times, kitsch) anecdotes. The solution is then provided, in the form of take-away behaviours that can be practised over time.

This book would have been improved with the addition of the following artefacts:

- A wall guide or infographic contrasting the 'Essentialist' and 'Non-Essentialist' behaviours for easy reference and to refer back to

- A maturity model or similar allowing the fledgling leader to self-rate their behaviours

I also found this book lacking in solid empirical research; much of the narrative is fleshed with anecdotal rather than research or evidence-based information, which detracts overall from the credibility of the book.

The best business / self help book I've read this year. I've heard a lot of the principles as they've made their way around the blogosphere in the last 2 years, but to get it all in one package is great. Even the table of contents is essentialist.

"the way of the essentialist" strikes me a little odd sometimes... Maybe I did not listen carefully enough, but I would assume I would affront a lot of friends and close acquaintances by saying: "Sorry, I cannot do that. It is not essential to me"
Maybe it helps with making the most out of one's own limited time, but what about the connection to others? I would assume, that 'doing things for others, that are not essential to one's own goals' could help make a greater impact overall in the long term.

Disclaimer: I enjoyed listening to the book and I think there are practical things in there, that could prove helpful (especially for somebody like me, who makes it his own mission to solve other's problems). I am just not quite sure yet, if I really want to be the essentialist described in this book.

"We should begin by recognizing the reality that just because something is good is not a sufficient reason for doing it. The number of good things we can do far exceeds the time available to accomplish them. Some things are better than good, and these are the things that should command priority attention in our lives."
- Dallin H. Oakes, "Good, Better, Best"

That's basically what this book is about- learning to say no to some very good things so that you can pursue the best things.

I would love to see more people read this book. It's not a perfect book. As other reviewers have pointed out, many of the examples given are not great, and McKeown really likes to name-drop Stanford and the Silicon Valley tech culture. But the ideas in this book completely changed my outlook.