In this groundbreaking book, one of America's most fascinating writers turns his mind to this seemingly straightforward question. The question has confronted us since man discovered fire, but, according to Pollan, how we answer it today may well determine our very survival as a species. To find out, Pollan follows each of the food chains that sustain us -- industrial food, organic or alternative food, and food we forage ourselves -- from the source to the final meal, and in the process develops a definitive account of the American way of eating.
--back cover
This book is about where your meals come from, and the options you have. Michael says that he often gets approached about this book, years after it came out. "Your book changed my life!" He says just how it changed their life is always different; some people go vegetarian, some add meat to their diet. For me? It answered a question I never knew I asked, many years ago.
Review of "The Omnivore's Dilemma" on 'Storygraph'
4 stars
This book has been on my shelf for 13 years. I finally dusted it off, literally, and got down to reading. It has forced me, as I knew it would, to yank my head out of the sand with regard to food, where it comes from, what its production does to the animals and the earth, and a few other things I had happily chosen to forget since my vegetarian days.
While not a book for everyone, I found it informative and sometimes entertaining. I'm not quite ready to give up meat but I have found a local butcher shop that sells farm-raised, grass and pasture-fed animals. So there's a start.
Honestly, this was assigned reading for school. While not terrible, and actually a little more enjoyable than I anticipated, I couldn't care less about the subject matter. I understand that Pollan is pretty well regarded in his field, but I'm over it.
1) "You would think that competition among individuals would threaten the tranquillity of such a crowded metropolis, yet the modern field of corn forms a most orderly mob. This is because every plant in it, being an F-1 hybrid, is genetically identical to every other. Since no individual plant has inherited any competitive edge over any other, precious resources like sunlight, water, and soil nutrients are shared equitably. There are no alpha corn plants to hog the light or fertilizer. The true socialist utopia turns out to be a field of F-1 hybrid plants."
2) "I was curious to know what feedlot beef would taste like now, if I could taste the corn or even, since taste is as much a matter of what's in the head as it is about molecules dancing on the tongue, some hint of the petroleum. 'You are what you eat' is a truism hard …
1) "You would think that competition among individuals would threaten the tranquillity of such a crowded metropolis, yet the modern field of corn forms a most orderly mob. This is because every plant in it, being an F-1 hybrid, is genetically identical to every other. Since no individual plant has inherited any competitive edge over any other, precious resources like sunlight, water, and soil nutrients are shared equitably. There are no alpha corn plants to hog the light or fertilizer. The true socialist utopia turns out to be a field of F-1 hybrid plants."
2) "I was curious to know what feedlot beef would taste like now, if I could taste the corn or even, since taste is as much a matter of what's in the head as it is about molecules dancing on the tongue, some hint of the petroleum. 'You are what you eat' is a truism hard to argue with, and yet it is, as a visit to a feedlot suggests, incomplete, for you are what what you eat eats, too. And what we are, or have become, is not just meat but number 2 corn and oil."
3) "Tail docking is the USDA's recommended solution to the porcine 'vice' of tail chewing. Using a pair of pliers and no anesthetic, most---but not quite all---of the tail is snipped off. Why leave the little stump? Because the whole point of the exercise is not to remove the object of biting so much as to render it more sensitive. Now a bite to the tail is so painful that even the most demoralized pig will struggle to resist it. Horrible as it is to contemplate, it's not hard to see how the road to such a hog hell is smoothly paved with the logic of industrial efficiency."
4) "I looked into the black eye of the chicken and, thankfully, saw nothing, not a flicker of fear. Holding his head in my right hand, I drew the knife down the left side of the chicken's neck. I worried about not cutting hard enough, which would have prolonged the bird's suffering, but needn't have: The blade was sharp and sliced easily through the white feathers covering the bird's neck, which promptly blossomed a brilliant red. Before I could let go of the bird's suddenly limp head my hand was painted in a gush of warm blood. Somehow, an errant droplet spattered the lens of my glasses, leaving a tiny, fogged red blot in my field of vision for the rest of the morning."
5) "The industrial animal factory offers a nightmarish glimpse of what capitalism is capable of in the absence of any moral or regulatory constraint whatsoever. (It is no accident that the nonunion workers in these factories receive little more consideration than the animals in their care.) Here in these wretched places life itself is redefined---as "protein production"---and with it "suffering." That venerable word becomes "stress," an economic problem in search of a cost-effective solution such as clipping the beaks of chickens or docking the tails of pigs or, in the industry's latest initiative, simply engineering the "stress gene" out of pigs and chickens. It all sounds very much like our worst nightmares of confinement and torture, and it is that, but it is also real life for the billions of animals unlucky enough to have been born beneath those grim sheet-metal roofs into the brief, pitiless life of a production unit in the days before the suffering gene was found."
This book has made me think more about what I eat than anything I've read/seen/heard. Some fascinating stories in here that will force you to look at dinner a little differently.
This was a slower read than In Defense of Food and more of a personal narrative, as Pollan talks about his efforts to explore the food chain and trace foods from their origins to our plates. It was still an interesting and thoughtful read, but I would recommend starting with In Defense of Food instead.
It's 2010. By now you know about CAFOs, Big Agriculture, and destructive government subsidies. You'll chug DDT before touching HFCS. You think about your food... or you think you do. Is there anything you can learn from Omnivore's Dilemma? Any reason to read it? Well, yes. Do you know the carbon-sequestering adaptation that makes corn so efficient? Why the "NPK mentality" is so (seductively) dangerous? What about alternatives: what does "organic" mean? There may be much in here that you already know, but I'm confident that there's much you don't. More importantly, this is stuff we need to be reminded of, stuff we need to think about regularly.
A great read. At first I was skeptical of the very personal first-person writing style, given that the book is still journalistic non-fiction at its core, but the style wound up enriching the content and driving many of the points home. Highly recommended to anyone who is interested in learning more about the way we eat.
Bravo! This is the kind of book from Pollan that I wanted to see after reading [b:The Botany of Desire|13839|The Botany of Desire A Plant's-Eye View of the World|Michael Pollan|http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1166573832s/13839.jpg|908398]. Researched and well-edited, but refreshingly introspective and well-balanced with real life experience. Pollan journeys into the heart of conscious food preparation and eating and brings his insight to fruition in an extremely thoughtful manner, by tracing 4 different meals to their source and explicating the process of how they came to his table. On the way, he teaches us of the irony behind the industrial use of the term "organic", reminds us of the horrors of agribusiness, chides vegetarians for their philosophical naivete, and gently guides us into appreciation of what it is to be grateful for and be fully aware of what we put into our bodies.
Pollan, as in The Botany of Desire, loves to embark on tangential …
Bravo! This is the kind of book from Pollan that I wanted to see after reading [b:The Botany of Desire|13839|The Botany of Desire A Plant's-Eye View of the World|Michael Pollan|http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1166573832s/13839.jpg|908398]. Researched and well-edited, but refreshingly introspective and well-balanced with real life experience. Pollan journeys into the heart of conscious food preparation and eating and brings his insight to fruition in an extremely thoughtful manner, by tracing 4 different meals to their source and explicating the process of how they came to his table. On the way, he teaches us of the irony behind the industrial use of the term "organic", reminds us of the horrors of agribusiness, chides vegetarians for their philosophical naivete, and gently guides us into appreciation of what it is to be grateful for and be fully aware of what we put into our bodies.
Pollan, as in The Botany of Desire, loves to embark on tangential dreamy intellectual meanderings, but this time around, he harnesses his gaze and keeps it focused on elaborating the intention behind his writing. His writing itself can be clever and utilizes deft turns of phrase and word placement, but without being overly wordy and self-conscious.
His (subtle) indictment of industrial agriculture is well-grounded in a thoughtful and researched omnivorous exploration of the alternatives. Eat on, conscious omnivores.
A nice blend between investigative journalism and narrative. It started out a little dry and thick (but very interesting) and blossomed into something a little lighter and captivating.
Really good read. Very interesting though hard to pin down exactly what it's about. Food... something. The omnivore's dilemma basically boils down to what do we eat when we can eat just about anything? The book touches on that a few times, but mostly is an account of the author's journey to bring together a meal completely (almost) of his own making. Through hunting, gathering, foraging, of all local, in season ingredients. An excellent read, Mr. Pollan has an excellent voice, and I found myself wanting more at the end of this book.
I'd recommend it to anyone interested in food issues, and life issues in general.
I was loaned this by my friend, Jasmine, who thought I'd enjoy it/should read it and I have to say that her prediction was spot-on.
If you've ever wonder about the state of our industrial food system today (what's wrong with Agribusiness, mass distribution of heavily-processed food, the apparent necessity of such a system given our ever-expanding national and world population, how we got to this point), this is the book to read. Pollan covers everything from the co-evolution of corn and modern agricultural practices to the conditions of large feedlot operations to "grass farmers" to the benefits and limitations of foraging and hunting to the definition of "organic" in our present-day food economy.
This book is a sweeping tour de force that encompasses a LOT in its 300 or so pages. Some have accused Pollan of misrepresenting possible "solutions" to problems he addresses here, but I think he does …
I was loaned this by my friend, Jasmine, who thought I'd enjoy it/should read it and I have to say that her prediction was spot-on.
If you've ever wonder about the state of our industrial food system today (what's wrong with Agribusiness, mass distribution of heavily-processed food, the apparent necessity of such a system given our ever-expanding national and world population, how we got to this point), this is the book to read. Pollan covers everything from the co-evolution of corn and modern agricultural practices to the conditions of large feedlot operations to "grass farmers" to the benefits and limitations of foraging and hunting to the definition of "organic" in our present-day food economy.
This book is a sweeping tour de force that encompasses a LOT in its 300 or so pages. Some have accused Pollan of misrepresenting possible "solutions" to problems he addresses here, but I think he does a good job of qualifying each assertion he makes with the necessary disclaimers and cautionary factoids (and if those seem tossed off, it's simply because so many other sources address the issue and he's short on space). Is that giving him the benefit of the doubt? Maybe. But I think he makes a lot of good points, regardless.
This book left me with a lot of really helpful, and interesting information, a better understanding of the events leading up to our current food situation, and some questions that would be answered in Pollan's next book...