Debt

The First 5000 Years

ebook, 576 pages

English language

Published March 20, 2011 by Melville House.

ISBN:
978-1-61219-098-3
Copied ISBN!

View on OpenLibrary

View on Inventaire

4 stars (101 reviews)

The author shows that before there was money, there was debt. For 5,000 years humans have lived in societies divided into debtors and creditors. For 5,000 years debt and debt forgiveness have been at the center of political debates, laws and religions. The words “guilt,” “sin,” and “redemption” come from ancient debates about debt. These terms and the ideas of debt shape our most basic ideas of right and wrong. [source][1]

[1]: www.amazon.com/Debt-Updated-Expanded-First-Years/dp/1612194192/ref=dp_ob_title_bk

23 editions

Review of 'Debt' on 'Goodreads'

5 stars

How much do I love this book? Well it's the only book I have a pair of earrings made to look like.

Unravels everything I thought I knew about money, economic systems and debt. As dull as those topics sound, these unravelings expose a lot of assumptions about human nature. This is a book about human nature as much as it is about debt. History is far weirder and more compassionate than we've been led to believe.

I could read this over and over until I have it memorized.

Monumentalna rozprawa zwalczająca powszechny mit barteru i początków pieniądza

3 stars

... oczywiście mimochodem przypominająca anarchistyczną (w radykalnym tego słowa znaczeniu) przeszłość ludzkich społeczności.

Czytałem przez jakieś dwa lata i miałem miejscami poczucie że czytam wciąż to samo na nowo. Niemniej mnogość przypisów, przykładów (czy bardziej anegdot) robi wrażenie. Na ile książki Graebera są faktycznie zgodne z rzeczywistością — pozostawiam środowisku do rozstrzygnięcia. Narracja Graebera oczywiście zyskuje na jego lekkim, łatwo przyswajalnym piórze.

Jest tu wiele o walutach, spłacaniu, kasacji i etyce długu, barterze, religii, rodzicielstwie i państwie. W imponujący sposób autor opisuje tu historie finansowe z Chin, Indii, Mezopotamii, Rzymu, Egiptu, na przestrzeni stuleci. W pamięci zapadł mi przeciekawy opis buddyjskiego rozwoju korporacjonizmu i samonapędzającego się wzbogacania klasztorów opartego na religii wzrostu, niczym wspolczesne MLM-y, ukróconych potem przez konfucjańskie chińskie rządy.

„Jeśli historia czegokolwiek uczy, to tego, że nie ma lepszego uzasadnienia sposobów opartych na przemocy, nadania im pozorów moralności, niż przedstawienie ich w kategoriach długu — przede wszystkim dlatego, …

How we got here and why we're stuck

5 stars

I read Debt right after The Dawn of Everything (also by Graeber), and my opinion of these two books is closely interlinked. The combination is an extensive unwinding of the sort of economic and social history I learned in school. I've had to re-imagine the ways that humanity developed our relationship with agriculture, with technology, and with the interplay of social obligations which we now categorize as money and economics.

The core insight and question isn't any of those individual revelations. What Graeber is trying to get you to think about is the stickiness of contemporary social relationships & structures, and the ways that we have lost the ability to imagine the possibility of change. No economic or political system has ever been as committed as ours is to narrowing the realms of the possible and foreclosing the ability to imagine other ways of organizing society. Historically, social dynamics have …

reviewed Debito by David Graeber (La cultura -- 0770)

Review of 'Debito' on 'Goodreads'

5 stars

The book is clearly not a light reading, the text is dense with notes, quotes and references. I liked the way it is organised and the clear prose of Graeber.
I think this is probably one book that should be read by anybody who is interested in politics and economics, because it helps grounding modern concepts into the roots those concepts have: money, debt but also community, sharing, slavery and so on.



Review of 'Debt' on 'Goodreads'

5 stars

Definitely worth the read. Gets a bit too chatty at times, could use a slightly tighter structure, but the contents is great, and there is a lot of food for thought. The language is accessible and I probably didn't understand every point he made but just the many examples he gives themselves draw a picture of what "money" and economics is, what its roots are, how it shapes not only our economy but also our culture and social relations, and the most important parts: There's nothing God-given about this and things can be different.

Violence ends in Debt

5 stars

David Graeber is a master of taking a familiar idea, then leaving it precisely where it is, and moving you as a reader around it to see it from unexpected angles. In Debt he does this masterfully. Beginning with a critique of the moralistic perspective of debt ("one should pay one's debts"), followed with a sharp denial of a common claim by most modern economists (that barter preceded money), Graeber lays into five thousand years of economic history via meticulous research and his own brand of coy, enjoyable writing.

From an anthropological analysis of contemporary societies to a historical analysis that thankfully takes in European and non-European views, the book is appreciably ambitious. It seamlessly links debt and contemporary economics to war, plunder and violence, something that has been long discussed but rarely so eloquently. It is also not without its flaws or a few broad claims, but Graeber's way …

Review of 'Debt' on 'GoodReads'

3 stars

Debt is an anthropologist's take on the history of money, debt, and political economy. The book is largely an attack on many of the assumptions mainstream economists make about human nature and human history. Foremost among those false assumptions is what Graeber calls the Myth of Barter - the idea that prior to money, trade happened only through barter. Graeber, like others before him, points out that a society or economy organized around barter has never existed. Instead, the earliest human societies organized trade around centralized communal distribution or (much more commonly) credits and debts, often elaborately measured and recorded.

Graeber then re-tells 5,000 years of economic history, arguing that history can be seen as a cycle between debt-based and money-based societies. He explains that the first money-based societies were largely an outgrowth of imperialism, war finance, and slavery. The general idea is that imperial states began to raise professional …

Review of 'Debt: The First 5,000 Years' on 'Goodreads'

5 stars

A thoughtful dive into the history of currency, what we all owe each other, and the philosophies of equality and merit we take for granted underpinning everything. Ultimately, Graeber critiques capitalism without suggesting any quick fixes.

He ascribes a considerable amount of intentionality and architecting to our current system, and his historical storytelling sometimes invisibly transitions into factually unsubstantiated musing, but his ideas are gristle for thought, and good leads into more reading on the philosophy of value.

Review of 'Debt' on 'Goodreads'

4 stars

Everyone really needs to read this book. I just finished it today and will probably need to go back and read it again to fully process it. But my very, very brief summary would be - Everything you know about the economy is wrong. Debt is not evil, in fact it can be key to human relationships. Barter didn't come before money. There is a straight line connection between cash, government, war, slavery, and the deterioration of all human relationships. We all need to stop being industrious little worker bees and start imagining a different kind of economy before the whole thing goes to shit even more than it already has.

Review of 'Debt: The First 5,000 Years' on 'Goodreads'

5 stars

Very thought-provoking read. The destruction of the Myth of Barter, and the spanking of the field of Economics for perpetuating it, is the obvious centerpiece for this book. In addition to that, I have to say the de-linking of "the market" and "Capitalism" was another big blow for me. It is obvious to me now that these two are not the same, but Graeber does an excellent job demolishing the foundations of received wisdom.

I will likely read this book again at some point, next time in text, not only to highlight some of the excellent lines, but also to try and grasp his judgement on credit. Though he denounces debt and ridicules coinage, he seems to be okay with credit, at least in its traditional "honourable" sense. Certainly he highlights the predatory, but I think I missed his final stance in the audio.

avatar for nevermore

rated it

5 stars
avatar for imbrandon

rated it

4 stars
avatar for kirkmoodey

rated it

5 stars
avatar for Ulrich

rated it

4 stars
avatar for nebuchi

rated it

5 stars
avatar for 22

rated it

5 stars
avatar for julianeon

rated it

5 stars
avatar for ZaneSelvans

rated it

3 stars
avatar for xianny

rated it

5 stars
avatar for cara-cara

rated it

4 stars
avatar for boogah

rated it

4 stars
avatar for lumii

rated it

5 stars
avatar for piotr

rated it

4 stars
avatar for Eldaerenth

rated it

4 stars
avatar for skolima

rated it

5 stars
avatar for cirok

rated it

4 stars
avatar for camdotbio

rated it

5 stars
avatar for intarga

rated it

5 stars
avatar for boldwater

rated it

5 stars
avatar for lucasrizoli

rated it

4 stars
avatar for mishari

rated it

5 stars
avatar for asmundg

rated it

4 stars
avatar for ianbishop

rated it

4 stars
avatar for vinibaggio

rated it

4 stars
avatar for wakatara

rated it

5 stars
avatar for pearlbear

rated it

5 stars
avatar for Chigaze

rated it

5 stars
avatar for wiebkehere

rated it

5 stars
avatar for the_lirazel

rated it

4 stars
avatar for fabriek

rated it

5 stars
avatar for kwm

rated it

5 stars
avatar for stinkingpig

rated it

3 stars
avatar for 73pctGeek

rated it

3 stars
avatar for Ivia

rated it

3 stars
avatar for Hirvox

rated it

4 stars
avatar for treyhunner

rated it

4 stars
avatar for bfordham

rated it

4 stars
avatar for rufzerg666

rated it

5 stars
avatar for AudientVoid

rated it

4 stars
avatar for DavidLove

rated it

5 stars
avatar for mlte

rated it

5 stars
avatar for Enno

rated it

4 stars
avatar for darkejokero

rated it

5 stars
avatar for kevbot9000

rated it

5 stars
avatar for shaffaaf

rated it

5 stars
avatar for inerte

rated it

5 stars
avatar for Jaldert

rated it

5 stars
avatar for Shtakser

rated it

5 stars
avatar for hsubu

rated it

4 stars
avatar for kyx777

rated it

5 stars
avatar for nosmo

rated it

5 stars
avatar for BillieCodes

rated it

4 stars
avatar for neilernst

rated it

5 stars
avatar for netherworld-td

rated it

4 stars
avatar for johnnycastrup

rated it

5 stars
avatar for anonymole

rated it

5 stars
avatar for DaveCline

rated it

5 stars
avatar for yasharz

rated it

5 stars
avatar for ospalh

rated it

5 stars
avatar for stalecooper

rated it

4 stars
avatar for qsaiyan

rated it

5 stars
avatar for akepa

rated it

4 stars
avatar for tastytea

rated it

4 stars
avatar for fosk

rated it

5 stars
avatar for Renaclerican

rated it

5 stars