Paperback, 16 pages
Published June 5, 1989 by Oliver & Boyd.
A boy grows to manhood while attempting to subdue the evil he unleashed on the world as an apprentice to the Master Wizard.
Refreshing to realize high fantasy doesn't have to be laid out in tomes and be riddled with vuolence. This book is short, entertaining and thoughtful. And Le Guin writes well.
Immense storytelling and really subversive for the genre when it was written.
A Wizard of Earthsea is a masterpiece in worldbuilding, a miracle of economical storytelling, an endlessly quotable novel, LeGuin's lyrical prose style at its most beautiful. The "saga" mode of writing makes this feel like a book out of a real Earthsea, constantly hinting at a fully existing history and cultural corpus. I also love the writings around it, reading the collected novels edition I'm surrounded by introductions, essays and afterwords from LeGuin herself that make me appreciate the text even more and show what a great human being she always was.
Fun and quick read. This was a perfect respite after reading way too many research papers and other weighty nonfiction.
This is a timeless classic I had read before. It is the story of the early years of the most famous wizard of Earthsea and how his early years formed him. Earthsea is a place of a thousand islands far away and yet somehow familiar.
I first read this in 2011 and rated it 3. I was unimpressed with the book and its sequels and couldn't understand why it was supposed to be so good. I didn't see it.
Now on re-reading, I can finally appreciate the timeless quality of its beautiful language and the clear, recognizable plot that still does not feel cliched or dated at all. And I can see how this must have inspired so many other books I have read. (I am looking at you [b: Name of the Wind|186074|The Name of the Wind (The Kingkiller Chronicle, #1)|Patrick Rothfuss|https://images.gr-assets.com/books/1515589515s/186074.jpg|2502879]).
Coming here and seeing my own …
This is a timeless classic I had read before. It is the story of the early years of the most famous wizard of Earthsea and how his early years formed him. Earthsea is a place of a thousand islands far away and yet somehow familiar.
I first read this in 2011 and rated it 3. I was unimpressed with the book and its sequels and couldn't understand why it was supposed to be so good. I didn't see it.
Now on re-reading, I can finally appreciate the timeless quality of its beautiful language and the clear, recognizable plot that still does not feel cliched or dated at all. And I can see how this must have inspired so many other books I have read. (I am looking at you [b: Name of the Wind|186074|The Name of the Wind (The Kingkiller Chronicle, #1)|Patrick Rothfuss|https://images.gr-assets.com/books/1515589515s/186074.jpg|2502879]).
Coming here and seeing my own 3 rating from just 7 years ago shows how much context means to reading books. My reading habits have changed and my enjoyment of this book is a completely different one.
Sometimes you can go home again. Just as captivating today as when it first sunk its hooks into me back in second grade.
Sweetly told coming-of-age story, that preaches Daoism as much as Daoism may be praught. I loved how it takes a very male story and turns machismo into a self-punishing weakness, but was also troubled by how even Le Guin wrote a story in which the women were all minor characters and very limited in what they could do. I gather later Earthsea books fix that, and look forward to them.
Sweetly told coming-of-age story, that preaches Daoism as much as Daoism may be praught. I loved how it takes a very male story and turns machismo into a self-punishing weakness, but was also troubled by how even Le Guin wrote a story in which the women were all minor characters and very limited in what they could do. I gather later Earthsea books fix that, and look forward to them.
This was brilliant. There is so much in it that I would not have picked up as a kid, but now it spoke very strongly to me. The notion of the conflict being an externalized version of the main character, the rambling pace that it took, and the focus on trust was all excellent.
I'm not normally a fantasy reader, but I love Ursula Le Guin. I heard her refer to this as her most anarchist book, so I had to read it. It is about power, knowledge, and how we need to own our worst selves. I found it delightful.
Dass es nur wenige Dialoge gab, war schon etwas nervig, auch wenn es zu der Plotline der "Reise nach innen" passt, die in diesem Buch herrscht. Großartig fand ich die Umsetzung der "Shadow"Idee von C.G.Jung (wenn ich mich nicht irre :P) Ich mochte die Wandlung des Hauptcharakters sehr , seine Auseinandersetzung mit Macht und Korruption. Es haben Frauen gefehlt imBuch und auch hier und da gabs nervigen Realweltsexismus. Anderseits waren beinah alle negativen Frauenfiguren weiß, während die einzige positive weibliche Person die gegen Schluss auftauchte, ein dunkelhäutiges Schwarzes Mädchen war,und auch der Hauptcharakter ist Schwarz. Generell wurde "weiß" als Marker für barbarisch und unattraktiv benutzt, was angenehm war,grade für ein Buch von 1968. Aber ich mag v.a. auch das Handwerk . . Le Guin schreibt großartig und ich kann sie flüssig lesen, und ihre Worte ziehen mich ziemlich schnell in ihren Bann!
A classic with no immediate legacy, unfortunately, than Le Guin's own series. A pitch perfect exploration of power, ambition, and responsibility that should have had more of an impact than it ever did. The clear plotting, the sharp characterization, and an evocative world makes for one of the best fantasy novels ever.
A Wizard of Earthsea is one of the most important fantasy novels in the genre, right up there with Tolkien. Reading this book, finally, for the first time, I see how other novels have stood on its shoulders (most notably the Kingkiller Chronicles), and I am glad this book exists.
That being said, it is not a book for me; possibly, Ursula K. Le Guin is not an author for me. It reads like it was written by an anthropologist (in fact, I was certain she must be until I looked it up just now), which was fine during The Left Hand of Darkness, but dry and wearing during a fantasy adventure.
As with many books I'm just getting around to, I think to myself, "If only 10, 15, 20 years ago someone handed me this book."
Points off for style. A strange choice. Props to her for pulling it off, but I just don't like it. maybe if I listened to the audio book it would have been a better experience?
Regardless, I plan on reading the rest of the series. Excellent world-building.
I loved this novel. It was an excellent representation of what fantasy is, and it was well written to boot. After reading this book, I feel that I can look to Le Guin as a model of how to write fantasy novels. As someone who is trying to write her own novel, I enjoyed the book on an extra level, as it provided many examples for accomplishing certain aspects within a story. I loved the way she introduced Sparrowhawk, and how he was a pretty unlikeable character at first, and the way she transformed him into a sympathetic character. His character was fairly simple too--he had simple motivations, feelings, and reactions. She didn't overcomplicate him or her story, and in that way as well, it was a very refreshing read.
